President Trump has been vomiting executive orders since the day he took office for his second term. He issued 26 on his first day alone and has issued 263 as of June 1, 2026. Other than Trump in his first term (he wrote 220), no President has come close to writing over 200 executive orders for their entire 4-year term.

Recently, one of these orders reclassified a whole bunch of civil servants – part of the bureaucracy – as political appointees subject to less strict rules on hiring and firing (i.e., they can be fired at will for any reason).

This was a major part of Project 2025.

Why was it a centerpiece of Project 2025? Thank you for asking. Inquiring minds want to know.

The short answer is that a professional, non-political bureaucracy is one of – if not the most – important hallmarks of a democracy, and one of – if not the most - important bulwarks against dictatorship. Whether it’s at the IRS or CDC or NIH or NOAA, the ability to control employees and insert non-experienced, non-expert partisan staff serves two purposes: it allows the executive branch to attack people/policies it views as enemies of its desire to control government, and it contributes to destroying people’s faith in their own government. Both of these outcomes are essential to asserting authoritarian control. The architects of Project 2025 understood this and set out to destroy a hidden linchpin of democracy.

Let’s back up a bit:

  • Prior to President Trump’s first term, civil servants serve under “Competitive Service”, which is governed mainly by the Pendleton Act of 1883 and Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. The rationale behind the Act was simple yet critically important: Ensure a stable, career-based workforce insulated from politics and keep the federal workforce nonpartisan. This meant federal government employees were/are expected to serve any administration equally. Core features of the Act include:

    • Hiring based on a merit system (competitive exams, structured hiring rules)

    • Strong protections against political firing. Employees can only be removed for:

      • misconduct

      • poor performance

      • documented cause with due process

  • Trump created Schedule F by Executive Order #13957 in 2020 during his first term. This allowed certain civil servants to be reclassified to serve under “Excepted Service”. The rationale behind Schedule F was simple yet incredibly nefarious (from a democracy perspective): create a more politically responsive (i.e., partisan) workforce with less job protections. In essence, Schedule F reversed the protections of the Pendleton and Civil Service Acts by increasing political (Presidential) control over the federal bureaucracy and allowing the Trump administration to more quickly replace staff for any reason. Core features of Schedule F include:

    • Allowing reclassification of certain federal employees into an “excepted service” category

    • Targeting employees in policy-making, policy-advising, or confidential roles

    • Removing merit and expertise-based hiring

    • Reducing civil service protections

    • Allowing removal “at will” (compared to traditional system)

    • Limiting formal job appeal rights

Again, Executive orders are not law and they don’t replace law. Creating Schedule F via EO was Trump and Project 2025’s way of quietly neutering existing law. Of beginning to create a class of loyal federal employees -not loyal to the constitution and the country, but loyal to a President who could dole out spoils and decide on his own whim who deserved a job and who didn’t.

To repeat, control of the bureaucracy is one of the foundational pieces of creating and maintaining an authoritarian form of government. Project 2025 was very clear on this point.

Reclassification of federal employees is “inside baseball”. It is something that is being done under the radar, and it is not a “breakthrough” issue that engages the public’s attention. Yet it is as important an issue from a democracy standpoint as any other action taken by Trump and his minions. Schedule F is anti-democratic and anti-American.

It’s time to provide some disinfecting sunlight on this hidden and venal undertaking.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Scott H4 months ago

I was a Federal employee from 1985 to when I retired at the end of 2023, that's 38.5 years.

I've heard all the stories and yeah, I've seen plenty of people and circumstances that live down to those stories.

Guess where I've heard just as many bad ones and plenty of worse ones? From an old buddy who was a pointy-haired mid-level manager at McDonnell Douglass-then-Boeing when it was bought out.

I was almost always surrounded, first as an intel officer for two DoD 'nodes' (Navy, then DIA at the Pentagon) then a friggin looooong time for FHWA (part of DOT), by competent, conscientious hard working people who took their jobs seriously.

For example, when we deployed two carrier task groups to Taiwan in 1996, I was the morning briefer at the Pentagon. I was working 16-hour days, 6 days a week for almost 3 months solid. Groused about the hours like any normal person would but didn't begrudge the effort because it was important.

It's depressing beyond belief what Hair Furor is doing.

Avatar

C P4 months ago

Treating civil service positions with respect means admitting that civil servants actually do important work as instead of sitting around on their asses playing Angry Birds and sucking up tax money, and that they're actually conscientious professionals who do their job as best they can instead of partisan liberals who cackle maniacally as they figure out plan after plan to make red staters (or whoever's currently complaining about them) upset.

Given how many people's entities identities revolve around blaming them for all their problems instead, I can see how it's going to be an uphill battle saving the civil service.

Avatar

Busted Knee4 months ago

LMAO you ever worked or contracted for the civil service? I know you are being sarcastic but it's a rough job. The way Washington actually works is vicious. You get a fancy degree you go work for Deloitte. Then you go into the civil service, then you get out. Then you go back to Deloitte and screw over everyone and make your bag. You steal pensions, you out source jobs, you fuck people over and scream "DEI, female excutives, meritocracy, graduate degree, blm, and oooooh trans" as loud as you can.

I know this because I landed at Deloitte. Though I did it via the combat vet national security route.

Avatar

Busted Knee4 months ago

When I worked for an NGO I watched them flush millions down the drain only to come up with... .... ... mosquito nets! This involved countless trips of flying people with fancy degrees all over the fucking world to party and get drunk. Hosting multiple parties at our main office in Washington DC with unlimited booze and fine dining! All to come up with the solution that was already in place. We did charge the millions and throw a lot of parties that mostly white women with fancy degrees ran and got to travel a lot. We didn't solve a fucking thing.

Avatar

Busted Knee4 months ago

So I can tell you for a fact your tax money does go to stuff money into the pockets of mostly white, mostly women, do gooders, who produce nothing. They also drink and party on it. They get nothing done. Now that's not the whole federal force. But it's a swath of it and they do convert it into lucrative private jobs. Again it's always the upper middle class. Always.

Avatar

C P4 months ago

Now that's not the whole federal force.

It really isn't. Not even close. But it sure as hell seems to be where you've spent your entire life.

Avatar

Marmot Pimpernel 4 months ago

I recently met a former civil servant who took a buyout offer. I think it was either that or get harassed, and if you’re smart and skilled and experienced, you can find another way to use them.

He was high up in a transportation-related position, and moved to another country where he works at a city airport that’s undergoing renovations, and he’s lecturing at the big university where he’ll probably land a permanent job.

Yeah, so how is it idiot populists get away with sole claims to patriotism?

Avatar

John S.4 months ago

As long as we are stuck in this permission structure that delivers zero accountability for failed leadership, I don’t see how the sunlight breaks through to do its job.

I mean, even if you use a very basic rubric:

  • Makes a claim.
  • Reality diverges from the claim.
  • Blames external actors.
  • Makes a new claim.
  • Moves on before accountability arrives.
  • A leader who isn’t a failure should at least routinely fail steps 3–5. Trump follows these steps EVERY SINGLE TIME.

    Yet the Republican Party and the media have created an environment where Trump can fail ad nauseum because nobody holds him accountable for failure.

    Even when he fucks up the reflecting pool and it’s obvious that he did it.