Back from vacation. Nothing like a tropical week away from the U.S. to recharge, reenergize, and relearn that I’m still a really bad surfer.

Being away did give me some time to noodle over why, IMHO, even with all the bad things Republicans are doing and supporting, Dems are still losing the greater messaging battle. Why - even if we make great gains in the next election cycle - it will be primarily because Trump and gang are evil and not because Dems have re-established themselves within most voters Circle of Trust.

In between trying not to kill myself on a longboard and eating the most delicious fruit and fresh fish tacos, I had a thought. Dangerous, I know.

First, let me say this post is about strategy, not tactics. Tactically, every Dem should vote against anything that is not a Dem priority or acceptable to them morally and ethically. Against every Trump nominee that needs to be confirmed. Against any bill that supports Republican priorities. Also, as I’ve previously mentioned, use humor, ridicule and derision to respond to Trump and his cronies. And as much as possible, play on our home field when it comes to issues.

On to strategy.

It’s easy to forget - and most people don’t even know (because, ignorance of history) - that Newt Gingrich’s Contract with America enabled the Republican party to regain control of Congress in 1994 for the first time in over 40 years. It was simple to understand but also contained enough detail to catch people’s attention. It actually had a few good ideas and many really bad ones. the key is - IT WORKED!

To political junkies and insiders, the Contract With America might have seemed… cheesy. But we need to remember that a HUGE portion of the voting population just does not pay regular attention to politics. Bluntly, most of them are barely informed at best and ignorant at worst. Highlighting a seemingly ”bold” initiative like the Contract raised not just the profile of the policies the Republicans wanted to enact, it raised the profile of the entire party in a way that resonated - the pierced the Circle of Trust.

We need to do that.

This made me think that we need an even bolder initiative in that vein. That there is opportunity in the current disorder and distrust in our society. Stanford economist Paul Romer in 2004 said “A crisis is a terrible thing to waste.” which was echoed by Rahm Emmanuel (credit where credit is due) who said in 2008 that “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that [is] it's an opportunity to do things that you think you could not before.” That we need to lead by telling the public that our country has changed considerably since its founding 250 years ago. That we all need to understand now is the time to update and re-invent the American democratic experiment.

This new initiative should be something that, like the Contract with America, is easy to understand, written in plain straight-forward language, recognizes that “government” is not working for most people (both in perception and actuality), and opens the door for Democrats to reenter voters’ Circle of Trust.

And that took me way back to FDR and his Second Bill of Rights, which he proposed in 1944. It was focused mainly on economics, and included the following:

Of course, these ideas will need to be updated. As I mentioned above, it should begin with an unambiguously clear statement that Democrats recognize that government is not working for most people, but the answer is not the rampant corruption and forceful government intrusion into people’s lives championed by Republicans and Trump.

It should include a strong anti-corruption component and a strong program for reducing inequality and the influence of corporations and billionaires in American society.

It should also include a strong immigration component that reflects the need for secure/controlled borders while also emphasizing the need for higher legal immigration limits AND consequences for corporate/C-Sute lawbreakers who knowingly hire undocumented workers to perform what is basically slave labor.

And, yes, to borrow from Gingrich’s Contract with America, it should include congressional reforms (a few possible examples: ban on stock trading, removal of congressional pensions, ensuring all laws that pertain to “regular folks” also pertain to congress, maybe even public financing of campaigns to remove big/dark money from politics) to show the American people that Dems “get it”.

Bernie Sanders even had his own 21st Century Bill of Rights during his Presidential campaign in 2020. Way to go Bernie!

Smarter minds than mine can figure out what to include. But one thing is certain - this needs to be done NOW.

Risky? Of course. Nothing is gained by playing it “safe”. In fact, I’d argue that Schumer, Jeffries and gang have lost the script (if they ever even had it). Now is not the time for moderation:

Now is a time - maybe THE time - for bold initiatives that are not based on poll-driven “political pandering”. Now is the time to lead with clear and easily understandable initiatives, ideas and reforms that recognize the tipping point at which our nation is currently teetering.

Democrats need to let people know - in words and deeds - that they “get it”. So simple to say and yet, for some reason, so hard for our current elected leaders to acknowledge.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur9 months ago

Excellent campaign ad!

"Today, I am proud to announce India Walton as my running mate in our campaign to become the next Governor and Lieutenant Governor of New York."

Video: https://bsky.app/profile/marisakabas.bsky.social/post/3me2acdh24c22

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur9 months ago

😍✊ "TAX THE RICH"

Avatar

mister mixAuthor9 months ago

Yep, agreed. I like FDR's list because it is broad strokes -- not a bunch of wonky details.

I think the current crop of Dems aren't ready to think like this, other than AOC, Bernie and the other people that are "too far to the left" supposedly.

Avatar

Joe is Wypoxic9 months ago

Have to agree with you on that MM. I think the current crop of Dems - especially the safer ones - have no clue that most people don't pay attention to all the inside the beltway crap.

Avatar

Scott H9 months ago

I'm as policy-focused as the next wonk but am always pushing the FDR approach as mentioned, or reference the Four Freedoms, etc.

But, not surprisingly, there's push back on that, typically in an effort to reframe the issue around the historic racial issues certain parties bring into the discussion or trying to couch is as an "FDR Coalition" when, of course, that's not what we're trying to promote.

But what we are trying to promote is at odds with the incrementalism, inherent conservativism of Dem leadership, it's reactionary centrist nature and it's supporters.

Avatar

Kay W.9 months ago

I think it’s worthwhile to try it. The biggest group of voters are voters who pay little or no attention. They’ll like a list that is a 5 minute read. I once hired a temp at the law office. She was good! Really efficient. She stayed in from lunch one day and was busily Googling. I walked past and she said “I’m trying to figure out who to vote for” - it was the absolute tail end of two year campaign, Obama v Romney. She was deciding based on 5 minutes of Googling. I think there a lot of those 😂

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur9 months ago

I once sent this to a girlfriend who told me voting doesn't matter (I was still very young and simply assumed she voted).

“The worst illiterate is the political illiterate, he doesn’t hear, doesn’t speak, nor participates in the political events. He doesn’t know the cost of life, the price of the bean, of the fish, of the flour, of the rent, of the shoes and of the medicine, all depends on political decisions. The political illiterate is so stupid that he is proud and swells his chest saying that he hates politics. The imbecile doesn’t know that, from his political ignorance is born the prostitute, the abandoned child, and the worst thieves of all, the bad politician, corrupted and flunky of the national and multinational companies.”

She wasn't insulted. I'd gone to college and her family did/could not send her and so she was very open to learning. I'd given her a huge encyclopedic type tome called Everything You Learn in College (or something like that), and she loved it.

Avatar

Joe is Wypoxic9 months ago

Unbelievable but tracks with my experience

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur9 months ago

Avatar

Joe is Wypoxic9 months ago

From digby's post: "It’s as correct today as it was then and yet political strategists are just allergic to accepting this notion and planning accordingly. You can’t win those people over with issue oriented campaigns because they don’t understand politics enough (and don’t care.) It certainly doesn’t mean that “moderating” on issues is what they are looking for."

I personally knocked on thousands of doors as a candidate. I put "low-info voters" at somewhere between 80 - 90% of the population. Issues may matter, but ONLY after finding a way to viscerally engage on a larger scale and then breaking into their Circle of Trust.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur9 months ago

AOC's "no fucks left to give" attitude and her offering of solutions' outside the status quo is a very good way to break in, IMO

Avatar

TXG1112 9 months ago

I think you’re 100% right about this, but I have serious doubts that any current Democrat is willing or able to pull this off. I suspect the first step will be to find and raise up a Democrat with the chops to successfully pull this off.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur9 months ago

Here is video (and transcript!) of AOC doing exactly what you said. She gets it!

https://crooksandliars.com/2026/02/we-can-all-enjoy-nice-monday-morning-pick

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur9 months ago

"And so, you know, 100 years ago, we had this type of market concentration in our banks, and we did something about it when it crashed the economy and we passed the Glass-Steagall act. We should be considering that in our health care system.

And if we believe in competition, I think we should put our votes and our legislation in alignment with that, and consider breaking up this industry in order to allow the competition that prevents this kind of vertical integration and abuse of power."

Avatar

Joe is Wypoxic9 months ago

She's really good and spot on. As a former hospital COO, the concentration of power in healthcare and the for-profit markups along the way make sure that, in AOC's words, "patients get screwed"

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur9 months ago

PS we again have a market concentration problem with banks!

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur9 months ago

I wonder how many ways currently exist to break up the behemoths so that Univeral Healthcare as a human right (with all the other things that should be in a new Bill of Rights) will take their rightful place as attractive solutions.