Some new regs for government hiring just dropped:

❝

“How would you help advance the president’s executive orders and policy priorities in this role?” asks one of four essay questions that job seekers must answer if they are seeking any federal position GS-5 or above. “Identify one or two relevant executive orders or policy initiatives that are significant to you, and explain how you would help implement them if hired.” […]

The plan calls on agencies to end any use of “racial quotas and preferences” in the federal hiring process, including usage of demographic statistics in hiring, recruiting, retention and promotion decisions. And it requires agencies to cease collecting and disseminating statistics “regarding the composition of the agency’s workforce based on race, sex, color, religion or national origin.”

It’s just clownishly stupid, and there will probably be a court order to get stay or reverse the policy, but this is just another example of how everyone who opposes Trump needs to come to the table with a plan to back this shit out. I’m sure there are plenty of pollsters lining up to say that Americans really don’t care about stuff like this, only Medicaid and Social Security, but come on. This is banana republic shit.

It’s possible to sound like a real stiff when you defend a certain kind of government regulations. It may be obvious to us that government employees should be chosen by an apolitical process, but it’s easy to spin this as “Trump just hiring people who will carry out his policies.” “You’re just trying to make it harder to hire good employees instead of lazy, shiftless bureaucrats.”

Instead of running away from this nonsense, we need to meet it head on and fight. But of course that’s true about all of the shit that’s flooding the zone. This one isn’t an easy layup, politically, but it’s critical if we’re ever going to make the trip back from being a failed state.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 year ago

As seen at crooksandliars:

"Reuters has the scoop on how cuts to funding safety trainings for occupations such as fishermen, loggers and farmers, via Secretary Brain Worm’s Health and Human Services Department, are about to put American workers more at risk:..."

Link to Reuters at link too:

https://crooksandliars.com/2025/05/trump-making-our-most-dangerous-jobs-more

Avatar

Busted Knee1 year ago

I don't think we can fight it.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 year ago

That's the spirit!

Avatar

Tam R1 year ago

I’ve seen this with companies and organizations. At the head of the organization is a malignant narcissist who is always correct, a visionary, and who is incapable of being accountable. That person surrounds themself with sycophants, and the entire MO of the organization is devoted to maintaining the delusion no matter the cost. It never works out well.

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

It never works out for the company or its employees, but it usually works out great for the shareholders and the sociopaths. I’ve seen way too many CEOs and their loyal sycophants fail upwards.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 year ago

Right from the get go, they're selecting for morons.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 year ago

In other words, death cult members.

Avatar

Tam R1 year ago

The is is infamously how the W Bush administration staffed their Iraqi provisional authority team.

Avatar

Kay W.1 year ago

The civil service system actually works really well for hiring - the various tests and bidding for jobs act as a mechanism to reduce bias - not just racial bias, but all the bullshit that gets in the way - favoritism, hiring relatives, etc. I thought the postal service hiring/review/ bid process was excellent when I was a manager at USPS. I took a lot of the ideas I learned there and used them running a law office.

Avatar

C P1 year ago

My dad worked for the State Department his whole life. I've taken the entrance exam half a dozen times and never passed. The fact that Dad ended up rising about as high as he could go without being a political appointee and that a lot of people in the organization knew and respected him meant nothing. If I can't pass the tests, I can't get hired, period, end of story.

How many private sector employers can say that?

Heck, half the headaches I've had at my current employer come from a middle-management clique of people who all started out here fifteen or twenty years ago and have progressively risen higher and higher in the company by hiring each other. I've heard about the job interviews in those parts of the company. If you're in the club, you run your own interview. If you're not, it's "on December 17th, 2015, you filed receipt XYZ in Folder JA rather than Folder JL. What do you have to say for yourself?"

Avatar

green goblin1 year ago

My experience in the private sector is the same.

Avatar

Dennis Doubleday1 year ago

"Would you want a Democratic president asking these questions in the employment application?" might make them think about it.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

The problem is that DC media, and Republicans, expect Democrats to just roll over next time they're in power. Signaling now that we won't is important and can limit the Trump administration. But it's not happening.

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

It’s Sunday, so another opportunity for Democrats to show us how they’re not going to roll over. I don’t expect much, but here’s to hoping.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 year ago

Rupert Murdoch about to be in charge of National Security Daily Briefings cuz our boy does not read:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/gabbard-considering-ways-revamp-trumps-intelligence-briefing-rcna209805

Bimbos from Fux Snewz will be given security "clearances" to create special videos instead of briefs. JFC and Hannity