The National Review came out with a somewhat amazing article yesterday.

For those of you unfamiliar with the National Review , it was founded in 1955 by William F. Buckley Jr., a scion of the intellectual conservative movement in the U.S. To give you an idea of what the NR stands for, the header on the webpage for the National Review Institute carries the following tags:

CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT • FREE ENTERPRISE • MORAL BEDROCKS
A STRONG DEFENSE • LOVE OF COUNTRY • DEFENDING WESTERN CIVILIZATION

You get the idea.

It’s short, so I’ll paste the entire text below:

There are plenty of reasons to fear a Democratic trifecta in Washington, which next week’s midterms may very well set up for 2028. Below is a list of actions and policies that give conservatives cause for alarm:

  1. Blowing out the national debt on a party-line vote that bypasses the Senate filibuster.

  2. Threatening to eliminate the filibuster entirely to shove through partisan legislation.

  3. Openly circumventing Supreme Court decisions through extralegal executive actions.

  4. Appointing partisan hacks to lifetime judicial positions.

  5. Governing almost exclusively through executive orders to bypass the legislative process.

  6. Targeting political enemies with selective and pretextual prosecutions.

  7. Further turning the machinery of the administrative state against political enemies over their constitutionally protected associations.

  8. Attempting to dominate civic institutions by having the government lean on them.

  9. Carving up the tax code to funnel money to special interests.

  10. Cozying up to China to bolster our commercial ties.

  11. Diminishing our military preparedness to fight a major conflict.

  12. Seizing control of private enterprises and turning them into effective arms of the state.

  13. Pressuring the Federal Reserve to flood the economy with easy money.

  14. Allowing criminal migrants into our country.

  15. Punishing people without due process.

Truly frightening stuff. Obviously, any party that would do such things should never be given complete political power.

I’ll let my readers figure out the gist of this article (ok - I’ll give a hint: satire). Read the links.

The NR has absolutely taken on movements it has deemed populist and/or far right in the past. However, to put this in print at this point in time is truly extraordinary.

Cult-like authoritarian movements tend to be brittle, with significant weaknesses that can lead to sudden breakdown. Primarily, this is because they are at the mercy of the Dear Leader. His (it’s pretty much always a man) foibles, urges, priorities, schemes, etc.

We’ve never really been subject to that in the good ‘ole US of A. Until now. Until Trump.

It seems pretty clear that Trump’s foibles, uncontrollable urges and mentally ill schemes have led us to an inflection point. A potential breakdown, if you will. Autocrats invariably overplay their hand, because they tend to truly start to believe that the “adoring” crowds they play to represent the entirety of the people over who they rule, when in fact, most of the time, it’s only a relatively small minority who are the true believers and followers.

Trump is being fed info from sycophants too afraid to tell him the truth. He’s huffing his own glue and loves the high.

I believe that’s where we are at in late October of 2026 here in the United States. Trump is deeply unpopular. Those who try to emulate Trump are failing miserably (Ramaswamy, anyone?). Republican candidates are running away from him and his “policies”, which are really more like ignorant whims. Dear Leader is physically and mentally unstable, and most everyone knows it. It’s too noticeable to ignore.

His rallies are getting smaller and the seats are getting emptier.

In deep red Lubbock Texas, James Talarico pulled in as many followers as Trump did at the same time at a fairgrounds two miles away from the Trump rally:

There are still hurdles to overcome and battles to be fought. Authoritarian movements, while brittle, do not give up easily.

Yet the telltale signs are there if you look closely. It’s on us to vote and then keep up the pressure on our team to boldly go where no [man] has gone before (or at least push to enact reforms, policies and personal accountability for the law-breaking elite that no Democrat has been willing to pursue in the recent past). No - we don’t have a fictional Captain James T. Kirk to lead the way. What we do have is a fed up majority finally willing to fight back…

David Bowie - Space Oddity

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Kay W.2 minutes ago

Abdul up 7 in CNN too - that’s two in a row. But his campaign thinks he polls ahead of where the race is, so let’s give him +5. That would be well ahead of Gary Peters, (retiring MI Senator) who only won by 1.7 in his last senate race.

Avatar

Kay W.13 minutes ago

Thanks for the inspiration. Talarico winning would be terrific, but I have come to like Hinojosa a lot so want both 🙂

Avatar

Joe is Wypoxic7 minutes ago

Abbott obviously needs to go and I do like Hinojosa. I’m hoping Hamilton in Kansas and Turek in Iowa can break through…

Avatar

Kay W.6 seconds ago

I think MI and OH are moving D in the end, so maybe those two will as well?

Avatar

C P14 minutes ago

I always thought of the National Review as the "we know which fork to use" part of the conservative movement. Their original feud with the John Birch Society was less about ideology than about respectability.

To paraphrase someone I read on Sadly, No! a long time ago, the truth is that people like this always despised 99% of the people on their side of the aisle as well. They just don't air that in public until it becomes convenient. (Like after their movement's gone far enough that it's really starting to smell rancid for the public).

I remember a National Review article from 2016 primary season, back when everyone was still sure that Trump was a loser, where a writer furious at the plebs for not picking their preferred candidates went on a whole rant about the fucked up and dysfunctional culture the WWC. The kind of stuff they've always written about blacks and immigrants and Muslims but that was always taboo to say about white heartlanders. It was a real masks-off moment.

Avatar

C P32 minutes ago

Thank you for picturing the very best Enterprise, the one from the movies based on the original series.

::scrolls back up to read article::