Rep Sarah McBride (D-DE-AL) center, Rep Julie Johnson (D-TX-32) and the true leader of the Democratic Party

Sarah McBride is in a tough spot. As the first openly transgender Member of Congress, she’s shit upon on the daily by the likes of Nancy Mace. She also angered the trans community by making some (what I thought were) reasonable statements about how the politics of trans acceptance were going to play out in an interview with Ezra Klein.

I’ll share my prejudice about the way the trans community does politics, and I say this as someone who knows some actual trans and non-binary folks (via my kid) who have been at different parties and celebrations at my house. In my opinion, the trans community tends to be really hard on allies. One example is the glitter bombing of Dan Savage, who I’ll grant wasn’t a perfect ally, but he’s a gay sex columnist in Seattle who was on the same side, if imperfectly. When McBride started in Congress and was essentially denied a bathroom, she chose not to make an issue of it, and she was criticized for that by some in the trans community.

Now she’s decided to pick a fight and it’s about two pieces of anti-trans legislation in Congress. You can see the video of her statement here. Key part:

❝

So, we are two legislative days away from the Affordable Care Act tax credits expiring, when millions of people will see their healthcare premiums skyrocket, And GOP leadership, with that deadline fast approaching, has decided to schedule two votes on anti-trans bills and precisely zero votes on extending the Affordable Care Act tax credits,” started McBride, before turning to Republican obsession on transgender people.

“They would rather have us focus in and debate a misunderstood and vulnerable one percent of the population instead of focusing in on the fact that they are raiding everyone’s healthcare in order to pay for tax breaks for the wealthiest one percent. All Republican politicians care about is making the rich richer and attacking trans people. They are obsessed with trans people. I actually think they think more about trans people than trans people think about trans people. They are consumed with this and they are extreme on it.

That’s a pretty good statement, and it taps into the same powerful vein of political criticism as Tim Walz’ “weird” rhetoric, which was obviously cancelled by the brain geniuses who ran the Harris campaign into the ground.

By the way, the Erin in the Morning newsletter is written by trans journalist Erin Reed, who is married to trans Montana legislator Zooey Zephyr, and Reed has also been critical of McBride in the past.

Anyway, the fact that McBride was accompanied by only two members of her party should give those criticizing her a clue about the really tough position she’s in. Leadership is shitpants scared of the trans issue. They want to run away from it, or completely capitulate to Republicans and adopt their talking points. I think it was a commenter here, or maybe someone on BlueSky, that pointed out that the primitive, basic politics of the Democrats’ position on trans folks is simple: if you can’t stick up for one part of your base, why would anyone believe that you can stick up for any other part of your base?

Trans rights is yet another issue where Democrats are going to be stuck with a Fox News caricature of our position if we choose to remain silent. It’s fucking stupid to be silent, but silence is a happy place for leadership. Instead, they should be ready with a quick statement similar to McBride’s on the weirdness of the Republicans’ trans obsession, and then pivot to the attack.

And fuck Gavin Newsom.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Kay W.11 months ago

I love Erin Reed. I follow and read her. She seems like a good advocate.

Avatar

Kay W.11 months ago

So how would one “defang” the school sports issue before the douchbags grab it? Find allies at high school sports orgs - when my kids played both tennis and swimming had national rule- making bodies. Get them on board. People love pro athletes - find allies there and promote them talking about transpeople in sports. We fucked up the sports issue and it is going to be hard as nails to change minds on that - it’s like 75% oppose at this point. We should have anticipated and preempted. We didn’t. Instead we yelled at people and insisted they didn’t care.

Avatar

Kay W.11 months ago

The sports in schools issue is big and will continue to resonate. As I have said, I don’t care for sports, follow no sports and do not object to transgirls competing, but I also don’t lie to myself - it is wildly unpopular. I hear it constantly, from Republicans, from Democrats, from people who are not at all political. Recognize that 1. High school sports are very important to many, many people and 2. we have fucked up selling this to them. They hate it. Yelling at people “why do you CARE about student sports?!” Is not going to work. They do care about sports - I don’t, but they do. Yelling at them isn’t going to help. It’s a measure of how out of touch we are that we decided no one actually cares about school sports. Have any of us attended, supported or had their children in a public school? OF COURSE they care about sports. The one and only reason I still have a local newspaper is they cover high school sports.

Avatar

Sepideh M11 months ago

I agree that this a big deal issue, but I think it should be left up to the governing bodies of the sports.

Friends who are generally pretty trans inclusive do not want to see a six foot girl named Lavender beating their daughter who is five foot nothing at tennis.

If we are in a place where trans-athletes are dominating sports (which we are not), the governing bodies can figure it out.

The same way we figure it out when prepubescent girls are dominating women's sports in a way that denies post-pubescent girls the opportunity to participate. This happened in women's gymnastics, and they changed the ages. This is happening in women's figure skating and has not been fixed yet.

Avatar

Kay W.11 months ago

I think that should have been done preemptively - take it to the various governing boards, find allies, and show people there will be rules. Don’t wait until Martina Navratilova, a gay liberal athlete, comes out and calls it “unfair” Our approach was just dumb - it was 100% scolding people and bragging about how tolerant we are.

Avatar

Busted Knee11 months ago

Newsome and Pete aren't wrong.

When Obama ran he said he wasn't for gay marriage and courted evangelicals. He won several states that are now blood red. What changed? Well when Obama won and got judges the courts legalized gay marriage and the mask dropped off the Democratic party and we stopped lying about it. Those voters, districts, states, are now permanently gone. It wasn't blackness it was gay marriage.

Avatar

Busted Knee11 months ago

When it comes to trans we cannot run on it the way we want to. If we do that 2028 is over and we should pack it up. The Newsome/Pete approach is what Obama did. Ignore the upper class white liberal demands on it, run where the country is at on it, then get judges in place to get what you were actually for all along. This is the way.

It's cynical as fuck but when we are as out of step as we are we have to sneak in our issues that way. Then we have to accept that our electoral map will shrink for a long time till the issue fully disarms.

You can defend rights without going fully max off the break, create the court system to go to the max, and then get it done. Just win should be our strategy whatever it takes. But that does mean talking less about social issues and doing more on economic issues. That's not acceptable to our donors or educated base.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor11 months ago

One thing to remember is that right wing media and social media both really got big after Obama's election. They helped feed the narrative about the horror of gay marriage.

Avatar

Scott H11 months ago

I've related this before, one of my oldest friends came out to us after 40+ years and then underwent some kind of transition surgery a little over a year ago. She's active in the Denver trans community and had this to say after McBride's interview with "let's equivocate over trans issues" Klein referenced above:

I want to like Sara and support her, but she is wrong on this. Erin's response is at https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/what-sarah-mcbride-gets-wrong?utm_source=publication-search Here's another take: https://www.readtpa.com/p/the-smallest-room-in-the-house I solidly agree with Erin and Parker; we can't go halfway on basic civil rights and appeasement will not satisfy the attackers.

Per Sepideh below, I have no idea if that's a uniform position of at least the Denver trans community. I only know that it echos what MM says above, namely, this is a basic civil rights issue and we're the party of civil rights dammit. Well, some of us are.

Avatar

Sepideh M11 months ago

I think a lot of folks are tired of Ezra Klein's nonsense. He is proposing a poll-driven politics, and a lot of folks are proposing politics-driven polls. Sell some issue that is not maximally popular or sell some issue that is maximally popular but we still cannot get done for mysterious rich people reasons.

Do not be a coward.

Avatar

Sepideh M11 months ago

The trans-community does not only hold one position on things. When McBride was given a hard time on bathrooms in the capitol, Chelsea Manning and others were doing a sit-in in the bathroom closest to Mike Johnson's office while McBride chose not to make a big deal of it.

McBride saved her capital for moments like this. The legislation that the Republicans are considering now is going to lead to the suicides of trans children. It is absolutely ghoulish, and the Democrats who are just shrugging, while Republicans decide to kill so more children other than those that they are already killing with the destruction of USAID and the current vaccine policy, are worthless cowards.

We need leaders who will act like leaders and are not willing to make human sacrifices because it is expedient.

Avatar

Scott H11 months ago

It always comes down to a quote by someone elsewhere:

To win, we have to offer, and mean, a better vision.

Shrugging as you put it, sure as hell ain't a) a better vision, and b) leadership.

Avatar

Sepideh M11 months ago

I have several trans peers in the field that I work in, and they are usually the ones helping me understand how serious these issues are.

The friends who sent texts to offer us a cup of tea and a warm place to sit for a couple of hours during our extended power outages over the past few days? Trans.

But usually, I am not telling everyone about the gender presentation of all my friends because frankly it is no one's business, and someone knowing someone else's gender presentation is not furthering the story.

Avatar

John S.11 months ago

In my more naive moments, I try to believe that we can live a world where people can have conversations and be friends and it doesn’t matter what is between their legs.

Avatar

Busted Knee11 months ago

Some republicans do want to kill trans kids. That's the reason they are attacking trans people though. They attack trans people because we take the bait every single time. All a GOP person has to do is say TRANS!!! and our educated base will claim it's the most important issue. Take over all issues by screaming about trans rights. Says if you talk about economics it's because you hate trans.

That shows normies that we care far more about trans issues than economic issues. It shows people who support trans rights but are struggling that the struggling will continue and get worse for trans rights. It gets the GOP back into power and trans suffer more.

We win on trans right until it hits transitioning children and sports. We need the courts to make that law and we cannot get the courts if we keep taking the bait on it.

Avatar

Sepideh M11 months ago

This is not true. Ezra Klein is the educated base. He is happy to throw folks under the bus.

Trans issues are a central issue for trans people but not for everyone else. We cannot run on it, but we can also not humor Republicans telling us that trans people are in the school converting the kids to trans furries.

Avatar

Marmot Pimpernel 11 months ago

I commented late last night in the previous thread about the various excuses Dem leadership makes in order to avoid acrimony. In this case, I’m betting they’re going with “don’t raise the salience of the issue!” Which I seriously doubt is supported by solid research.

Its flawed theory of politics lead it to refrain from attacking Repubs sufficiently. In the 90s, it was “negative campaigning turns voters off.” Just excuses to avoid being uncomfortable.