Here are all the things I don’t get about Schumer’s cave today:

  • Why did he let Jeffries go through the motions of whipping his caucus to almost unanimously vote against the CR — and clearly, some of them were afraid of this vote — if the ultimate end game was to pass it?

  • Why did he take days to do this? All that the drama around the CR did was disappoint engaged Democrats.

  • Does he (and his consultants) think that putting up some kind of a dumb show about this will work? To be clear, the show is: vote for cloture (60-vote threshold), vote for 30 day clean CR that will fail, vote against CR but it passes because there’s now a 50 vote threshold. Frankly, now that he’s let the cat out of the bag, I wonder if there will even be a 30 day clean CR vote.

  • Does he really believe the shit he spouted on the floor about how a government shutdown would enable Musk and Trump by letting them only re-open certain branches of government? Doesn’t he understand that Musk/Trump are already selectively shutting down government?

In AOC’s interview with John Stewart (I know, yuk), she talked about the predictability of Dems. She pointed out that the seniority system was one, and there are many other structures and hierarchies that Democrats hew to:

❝

It makes the Democratic Party highly predictable in the decisions it’s going to make, in the people that we’re going to select, in the type of people we advance in the way that we make decisions. And when we are highly predictable to the opposition, they will be one, two, four steps ahead. They know what Democrats are going to do.

With that in mind, one way to look at this week’s activities is that Pastor Mike knew that he couldn’t get a clean CR through the House. But he wanted to intimidate Democrats, whose expectation was that his historical inability to unite his caucus would give them a role in negotiating a CR in the House. So, Johnson put a bunch of shit that the Freedom Caucus would like into the CR. He knew it would pass, it passed, and he adjourned the House to put maximum pressure on Senate Democrats. He made a bet, a risky bet, that Democrats would cave and pass his piece-of-shit-CR. His bet paid off, barring a miracle. He combined his view of the predictable nature of Democratic response with a knowledge that his continued existence as Speaker requires fealty to Trump, in order to produce a result that would please Trump. And, goddamit, if the Senate passes this CR tomorrow, the one thing I know for sure is that Trump will be pleased, at least momentarily.

This will probably be one of the last posts I write about Congressional action to oppose Trump. Unless something major changes, Democrats in Congress have shown all of their cards. I’m going to now concentrate on: primaries, protests, and local and state action. I just hope Democrats don’t think they can fool us again, because part of this ugly spectacle was Schumer in particular running to the floor and telling bald-faced lies:

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Paul W.1 year ago

Schumer's every move on this fiasco is appalling. He knew it was coming, he saw the House stand strong, and yet he planned to capitulate anyways. His communication is horrible, his reasoning is horrible, and his strategy is the worst of all. It's embarrassing, I've been calling the office all week but he isn't listening and that's equally scary. I would like him to step down but I know his ego won't let him. So, a primary in 2028 will have to do.

Avatar

Sepideh M1 year ago

Good morning to Josh Marshall and no one else.

"I don’t like to speak ill of the politically dead, but Schumer is a weak man and a fool."

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/black-thursday-in-the-democratic-senate-an-explainer

Avatar

Marmot Pimpernel 1 year ago

Damn this is so disappointing. I just can’t believe that we not only have to beat MAGA, but also clean house in the Dem party or start some new one.

I guess a new one is out of the question? What the fuck do I know?

Avatar

Sepideh M1 year ago

Yup, you have to sweep house from the inside. People are writing Schumer even though he is not their Senator. Such a disappointment.

Avatar

Tam R1 year ago

We just don’t have leadership with our current congressional leaders. I’m beyond angry. Heartbreak? Despair? It’s not just now that we are in this constitutional crisis. The reality was that the Biden administration and the Democratic leadership failed to recognize we were in a crisis that whole time. We had an attempted coup and they behaved like it was business as usual. Soooo complacent.

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

What Schumer did was worse than complacent. He tried to piss on our legs and tell us it was raining.

Avatar

Sepideh M1 year ago

Yes. Schumer intentionally went out there and attempted to mislead voters.

Avatar

Tam R1 year ago

I’m done defending Democrats. We are in the fight of our lives and I don’t know if we can win. I’m afraid we can’t. But I want us to have some GD integrity.

Avatar

C P1 year ago

Long before 1/6, I was already saying that the most terrifying possible outcome of the future wasn't that we have another civil war. It's that "the South" fires on Fort Sumter, and due to how irretrievably entrenched and immovable the professional centrists are at every level of Washington and the Democratic Party, "Lincoln" either isn't even allowed, or isn't even willing, to fire back.

There's a very good case to be made that 1/6 was that Fort Sumter moment, and that we're now reaping the rewards of failing to rise to the occasion.

Avatar

Sepideh M1 year ago

The people in this clip of Chris Hayes talking to Schumer are starting AOC's Senate campaign.

https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3lkce57e4qs2h

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

The fact that be thinks he can go on MSNBC and tell some fairy tales and smoothe things over just shows how out of touch he is.

Avatar

Tam R1 year ago

He only knows how to operate in a world that doesn’t exist anymore.

In 2023 Biden was still talking privately about being asked to give Storm Thurmond’s eulogy as an example of how things used to be and as a good thing.

Avatar

C P1 year ago

Until some time in the last twelve months, I never seriously believed that one of the two major parties could actually undergo a Whig style collapse in my lifetime. Now, I seriously believe the Democrats have a good chance of ending up exactly like that.

Wish I had any confidence that what came next would be an improvement.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

2026 not looking good with the current team, that's for sure.

Avatar

C P1 year ago

Yeah, last night I said that I could totally see the next presidential election being a blowout on a level with Nixon or Reagan's second rounds, as much as anything because of low turnout among disgusted Democrats. I still think that's possible. But it could be even worse, too!

Isn't living in interesting times just. Fucking. Peachy.

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

Welcome to the Carville Plan.

Sit back, do nothing and hope that the Republicans magically implode.

I don’t ever want to hear another so-called Democrat bitching about the media and how they treat politics as if only Democrats have agency. That shit is over. The Democrats have no agency to do anything whatsoever, and they just let everyone know that.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

Somebody on BlueSky just posted his Op-Ed in the NYT defending what he did. I assume that means he knew this was the plan for a while...

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

I also saw someone post that Chuck’s daughters are employed by the oligarchy: One is at Meta and tight with Zuckerberg and the other is a lobbyist for Amazon.

I don’t know if that’s true, but it certainly as good an explanation as any. Between that and Chuck’s Wall Street donors, we never stood a chance.

Avatar

C P1 year ago

It's a club and we're not in it.

Avatar

Sepideh M1 year ago

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

I know it’s the NY Post, but jeez.