UAW President Shawn Fain spoke to UAW members last night

The title of this post is not an exaggeration, this was a wide-ranging speech that went from auto plant capacity in the US to the rights of student protestors on college campuses.

I read some of the media coverage and then listened to Fain’s whole speech and, well, it shouldn’t surprise anyone that the media coverage cherry picks where Fain agrees with Trump (reordering trade rules) and skips over how literally the whole rest of the speech is an attack on the Right. I think we in the US are not accustomed to hearing from trade unionists so we slot them into “Democrat” or “Republican” when really trade unionists like Fain are on the Left, meaning they see the world in terms of a class struggle. This is just not a view we see espoused in the mainstream in the US, so we don’t really know what to do with it when we hear it.

Fain opened with describing two shifts that are happening simultaneously – an upending of global trade along with an attack on fundamental rights - workers rights, civil rights, and basic human rights.

He went on to explain how labor views politics – not as a “about personalities or parties” but instead as a negotiation where labor focuses on what they need for the working class and what it’s going to take to get it: “we’re not aligning with the Trump Administration, we’re negotiating with the Trump Administration”

On tariffs, he says they don’t support reckless and chaotic trade policy but also can’t just support the status quo on trade – what he calls “the free trade disaster”

He asks - how do we end the free trade disaster while also protecting our right to organize and join a union? How do we end the free trade disaster while also protecting our right to protest genocide, our right to vote, or our right to receive basic health care?

He says Trump is responsible for destruction of bargaining rights for a million federal workers, gutting the NLRB, trampling of basic 1st Amendment and due process rights on college campuses and attacks on Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare.

“We are not Democrats and we’re not Republicans, we are trade unionists and we support Democrats when they support the issues and policies working people need”

 "there's been no change in where we stand politically as a union." 

"We expect, no matter what party someone comes from, to stand up for what we believe in. So just because we find common ground on tariffs or on trade doesn't mean that everything else goes out the window."

 One more thing- I keep seeing uninformed claims made about labor union members on Bluesky, how they are “majority” Republican. 60% of union members say they align politically with the Democratic Party. 55% of labor union members supported Harris in 2024. We can be mad about losing the last election without bitterly and vindictively making shit up about the parts of our coalition we dislike. You can dislike labor unions or labor unionists and think the Democratic Party should jettison this part of the coalition, but claiming the majority of them don’t support Democrats is just a lie.

Although many demographic groups shifted their votes to favor Donald Trump in 2024 compared to 2020, Kamala Harris increased Democratic support among union voters.

If Democrats got 55% of the whole working class like they get 55% of union members Democrats would carry Texas. Union members are not our problem. I would suggest we stop parsing which voters are the most loyal, lockstep Democrats and kicking everyone else out of the club and start figuring out how to attract more voters.

 

 

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Kay W.1 year ago

If you want to understand how labor unions intersect with politics, look at how Fain has gone to the mat for student protestors and people who are being deported for their political views. A lot of academic workers are UAW members. That’s the intersection 🙂

Avatar

Kay W.1 year ago

WSJ is absolutely freaking out this AM “consumer sentiment tanks!” “Trade war rages!” I confess I get a kick out of the Wall Streeters having panic attacks :) Jump, you fuckers

Avatar

Ramalama (ding dong)1 year ago

I'm just here to say HOLY shitbird, great post.

I'm so glad you and MM have joined forces here. It's a great fit. And I've shared the blog to several people I know, who have gotten back to me to say they too have subscribed. I can't remember when my people have done this - the enthusiasm.

I will soon share to people I don't know (a la social).

Avatar

r po1 year ago

Aha, I pulled up the comments to say precisely this. Very good post, I'm smarter for having read it. Thank you both.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 year ago

Hear, hear! Kay, thank you for highlighting the nuances that most won't bother to parse because petty resentments.

Avatar

Kay W.1 year ago

Fain specifically called out discrimination against trans people, twice. He complicates any narrative about “the white working class” because his message is so inclusive and I think that frustrates people who want to put working class voters in a tiny little box.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 year ago

I was a white working class voter and didn't fit in the tiny box either. Now I'm a solidly middle class retiree, but may become instapoor soonish. That will not cause me to resent anyone but those responsible for a stupid trade war. The stupidest trade war ever, IMO

Avatar

Scott H1 year ago

The media cherry picking Fain/UAW statements over the last month is par for the course.

Union-hating Dems as typified on another blog will do the same thing in order to throw organized labor in toto under the bus so stop it with the facts Kay, they don't matter. /s

And yet, when we criticize that part of the so-called 'coalition', we're told to stfu, we're "toxic", "purity ponies" or "you don't understand coalition politics". New Economy/White Urbanists show that cognitive dissonance is not confined to the right.

Fain's been consistent in his messaging and big chunks of it are a way for Dems as a party to reconnect with that element of voters the above-described Dems consistently ignore.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

I thought Biden's leadership on unions, and embrace of unions, helped some of what I'd characterize as technocratic Dems better realize their importance to the coalition. It's a huge bit of cognitive dissonance to love Biden and hate unions.

Avatar

Scott H1 year ago

The people I routinely rail against didn't love Biden by a long stretch. Didn't want him as the nominee in 2020 and leaped on the chance to shitcan him last year.

They're takes post-election have been simply to look for any reason to beat on unions, ie., their attitudes haven't changed one iota.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

Who did they support in 2020?

Avatar

Scott H1 year ago

Well, the ones at another blog were all in on Harris.

I've tried to find specific posts from the usual neolib "Dem Influences" and can't find any statements about who they were pulling for during primary season.

One indication tho would be Third Rate Ygelsias, aka Will Stancil. He ripped Biden a new one daily...until he decided to run for office himself and toned it down in hopes of getting votes from people other than his rich father's bigoted neighbors. That didn't work.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

Out of reply levels here but that's interesting. I never sensed a big Harris primary constituency.

Avatar

Kay W.1 year ago

If you roll in that "union households" include law enforcement unions that skew far Right, it makes the 55% number even better - we're probably getting 60% of non law enforcement union members, which equals our share of Latino support and no suggests jettisoning Latinos.

Avatar

Kay W.1 year ago

I dont know if I follow the wrong people on Bluesky or what but a lot of what I read there is just wrong - incorrect. Its disappointing.

Avatar

Scott H1 year ago

Yeah, I always rule out law enforcement unions in my general comments because their aims are far different than the UAW's or education unions, etc.

The "Abundance Bros" grew up in households that hated unions. They're the same ones that write off their electoral failures as due to only misogyny and racism. Big factors to be sure but ignores more fundamental issues that will continue to drag on any Dem ticket going forward, no matter how male and white any given nominee might be.

Avatar

C P1 year ago

"Although many demographic groups shifted their votes to favor Donald Trump in 2024 compared to 2020, Kamala Harris increased Democratic support among union voters."

If nothing else, this suggests that Biden's efforts on behalf of working-class voters in general and union voters in particular paid off, and should be continued.