It’s crunch time. Today, I’ll try to connect a few disparate stories into a single narrative: Democrats need to aggressively push the “It’s the Corruption, Stupid - and it’s hurting you and it’s destroying America” angle.

First, looks like Thomas Massie is taking the lead and showing Democrats what they should be doing:

Good on him. And this should be just the start. These people need to be held accountable and the voting public needs to know that it’s happening. Maybe Dems let Massie tale the lead because it’s got more street cred when a Republican brings the heat, but that’s no excuse. got that, Schmer and Jeffries? No? didn’t think so.

Next, Republicans know they're in troubled when one of their own true beleivers comes out against Trump on immigration:

My god! Maria Elvira Salazar (“Elvira”? I must admit I kind of like that middle name) is stronger and more blunt on immigration that many Democrats. Yeah - she’s desperate because she’s in a tight battle in a district in which she should be kicking butt.

Back to Rep. Massie leading the way. It seems as if he and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna have secured enough commitments to successfully vote for a discharge petition on the Epstein Files:

It’s amazing to me (and strongly dispiriting) how Democrats are unable to come up with a message and then focus like a laser on that message consistently over time. The Epstein Affair is not just perhaps the most sordid, disgusting and crime-riddled abuse scandal in our nation’s history, it’s political gold. And yet Republicans find it so easy to convince Democrats to take their eye off the ball at a moment’s notice for some other distraction. And we need a Republican to show us how to actually hit the pitch (excuse my baseball analogies of “eyes off the ball” and “hit the pitch”).

Which brings me to the other slam dunk issue of this campaign cycle: data centers. Of course, this topic is being flubbed by Democratic “centrists” and their consultants:

A recent NBC News poll shows roughly 70% of people are against datacenters, including 81% of Democrats, 71% of Independents and even 57% - a solid majority - of Republicans. C’mon Democrats! this issue has been gift wrapped and placed under your tree by Santa. Stop equivocating. Connect it to AI and tech bros and billionaires and the Epstein Class and inequality and gas prices and even what’s for lunch today. It’s. Not. that. Hard.

Next, because it wouldn’t be right to omit our Senate institutionalists:

Are you f*^king kidding me? I got nothing on this except don’t let the door hit you on the way out, Senator.

Finally, an anecdotal story that is confirmed by a recent CDC Report as well. I’m at a medical conference in Boston. I had dinner with a group last night and sat next to someone from the Netherlands. I asked how things were in his country and what the political environment was there. His response? To paraphrase, “We are wealthier than we’ve ever been but people are not happy. Something is not right.”

Now, check out this report from the CDC:

The article (and survey) tends to focus on physical health issues that cause fatigue. However, I’d argue a big contributing factor is the exhaustion and anxiety people feel from struggling to keep their heads above water in a country where the wealthiest coast while everyone else has to contend with the laws of the jungle just to consistently put food on the table and fill up their vehicles with gas.

There’s so much more but that’s enough for now. The upshot? There may not be a better political environment for Democrats to destroy their opposition. But they won’t get there by equivocating and playing it safe simply because they already have a lead in the “generic candidate” polls.

It’s time to put the pedal to the metal. Double and triple down on corruption and how the lack of accountability for it hurts regular people every single day.

I’ll end with the Democrat who seems to be doing it best, focused like a laser:

The Grateful Dead - Out in the Cold Rain and Snow

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Scott H1 month ago

Ah, data centers and the Ostensible Democrat. I have another recent example of this at the local level.

Three adjoining Registered Neighborhood Orgs co-hosted an open house/meetandgreet event last Wed. Part of those in attendance were five of the ten people registered to run to fill the seat of an at-large city councilperson who resigned in Aug due to health reasons.

These ten people are running for what is basically a 6-month term as the office comes up for real next April. Everybody here knows about the data center imbroglio in Denver and how our electeds are doing their damnest to make sure data centers are built w/o coming out and looking too eager about it.

Avatar

Scott H1 month ago

Of the ten candidates running, one mentions data centers and, no surprise, when you ask any of them "Would you support a ban on any future data center construction in Denver", he's the only one who unequivocally says 'yes'.

The other 4 on Wed went into the patented "hummada, hummada, hummada, MORATORIUM!", ie., Magic Words!© response which is a dead giveaway from candidates who are all Ostensible Democrats.

Thus, what I'm seeing in a "blue" city is a microcosm of just how captured Dems are on this and soooo many other issues.

Avatar

Scott H1 month ago

And if you still don't believe me:

https://x.com/politico/status/2100645468787396722

It's specifically regarding AI but at the level politicians should be talking to voters, the distinction between AI and data centers is nonexistent.

As somebody says in that comment thread:

They never go hard at tech companies. I’m not sure what they stand for anymore. and it's totally understandable why Dem candidates aren't saying 'boo' about data centers.

Avatar

C P1 month ago

I’m not sure what they stand for anymore

You know, for all the scolding and hand-wringing about how "the progressive wing" is screwing things up for everybody, the question no one ever asks is "without them, what the fuck does the party even stand for?"

Identity politics? That's not working anymore, if it ever did. Even black voters showed a small but noticeable move towards Trump last time.

The rich? They only back Democrats to undermine the more progressive party. Without that? They always liked Republicans better.

Thermostasis "not the Republicans" votes? The Republicans are busily remaking the political system so that they pretty soon that won't even be possible, and thermostatic voters show no sign of being aware or caring.

Who does that leave? People who read the New York Times? Please.

Avatar

r po1 month ago

Durbin and Schumer demonstrate eager preemptive capitulation. They are not on our (and our children's) side. In an age of Russian expansionist terror ascendant, Iran and its proxies exercising veto capability over a large fraction the world's energy flows, and LLMs rapidly infiltrating society, these olds have no idea what is going on. So they do what we see from similarly age and wealth situated people in our social orbit: deny, deny, deny, and demand with all their might that nothing changes in any aspect in their personal existence. Since they hold their seats of power until (or maybe even after, in the case of Feinstein and McConnell) they are functionally brain dead, we are effectively governed by an army of fully calcified stalagmites. Dynamite is required, or maybe just some intense primaries.

Avatar

Joe M1 month ago

Oh brother, that Durbin thing makes me twitch. How hard would it be to stand up and solemnly intone "We're honoring Mitch McConnell's legacy by invoking the McConnell rule blocking any SCOTUS nomination in last two years of a president's term". It's Senate precedent baby, honor the Institution!

The good news is Durbin is done this year, but his position on this may hint at what Schumer's thinks as well. Ugh.

Anyone have any idea how the D nominee to replace Durbin in IL would view this issue?

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 month ago

Durbin was next in line for Senate leadership. He and Schumer are on the same page.

Avatar

r po1 month ago

Is there really no practical political mechanism to get these useless blockers off the stage and consigned to some windowless closet with a power outlet? I've worked both in the Civil Service and for corporations where this happened when necessary. The word "comity" is going to be the death of us.

Avatar

C P1 month ago

The U.S. really is unfixable as long as you can count on enough Durbins to gum everything up no matter what elections are won.

Avatar

Joe M1 month ago

I'm hoping this coming election brings enough younger members who are looking for a fight to change some of this, but that may be delusional

Avatar

C P1 month ago

The problem is that it takes so few people to jam everything up. We had a 60 majority in 2008-2010 and it still wasn't enough to stop Liebermann and a few others to remove most of the good stuff from the ACA. We had a 50 majority in 2020-2022 and we got nearly nothing accomplished.

There isn't really an alternative to replacing the bad ones, but the fact that they need so few makes it really hard to be optimistic.

Avatar

David J1 month ago

Salazar is doing the typical GOP sleight of hand trick where she criticizes Trumps advisors and asks himself to get them under control. She not Audie Murphy in a skirt with that weak language. Other Republicans have used similar language in the past couple of months when it comes to criticizing current administration policy. They criticize his people but never Trump himself. Criticizing the doddering old fool directly is the road to pain and suffering and political death.

Establishment Dems don't understand the assignment. If Dems do win the Senate, and I believe they will, Durbin won't be able to hold back a revolt if he tries to move a Trump Supreme Court nominee forward.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 month ago

I'm afraid the current leadership doesn't know where the pedal even is.

The downballot has a good piece on Salazar's ad and the polling behind it.

https://www.the-downballot.com/p/morning-digest-vulnerable-republican-79d

Apparently Cubans in the district are also getting hassled by ICE and have realized that Trump doesn't give a shit about them either.

This wasn't in the piece, but Rubio's dream of invading Cuba isn't going to happen now that we're bogged down in Iran. Cubans in FL know that too.

Avatar

C P1 month ago

Are we sure we're not going to invade Cuba to take some eyes off of Iran?

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 month ago

I think at some point the military is going to push back hard, but what do I know?

Avatar

C P1 month ago

As near as I can tell so far the pushback consists of remotely competent generals resigning, Trump promoting General Rippers to replace them, and the plan going forwards anyway no matter how hilariously unprepared we are for it. CIA also engages in shenanigans somewhere along the line.

Avatar

Sepideh M1 month ago

Some Republicans are too racist for Karl Rove, and he will be voting for a Democrat. https://www.texastribune.org/2026/09/14/bo-french-kal-rove-endorsement-jon-rosenthal/

Avatar

C P1 month ago

Ah yes. You can always count on a Republican politician to do something right, long after they've stopped mattering! Barry Goldwater, Colin Powell, and George W. Bush say hi.

Say what you want about Liz Cheney, but at least her anti-Trump moment came when she was actually serving as a representative.