Lisa Murkowski made some news, as Republicans so easily can, when she stated the obvious at some gathering in her state.

Sorry that I have so little sympathy for her plight. People are afraid because of policies and politicians that she’s supported. If they betrayed her, then do something about that betrayal: join the Democratic Party. Of all the politicians in the Senate or House, Murkowski’s switch would be the easiest. She’s a popular brand in Alaska. She’s won elections as an independent. Other popular Democrats have won statewide elections (Peltola lost last cycle but young Begitch has been stinking up the place and she might flip AK-AL next cycle).

Under the “little more action” (very little) heading is the next piece of news:

❝

Colorado Rep. Jeff Hurd signed a letter with a group of lawmakers Monday urging fellow Republicans in the leadership of the U.S. House of Representatives to preserve and strengthen Medicaid.

The letter made clear the group’s support for the final budget bill hinges on the issue.

“We cannot and will not support a final reconciliation bill that includes any reduction in Medicaid coverage for vulnerable populations,” it said.

The letter comes as a budget blueprint, which could contain steep Medicaid cuts, makes its way through Congress. The federal-state program covers more than a million Coloradans, about a fifth of the population. 

Hurd represents the R+5 CO-3 district, which is basically all of Colorado west of the Rockies, swinging east to pick up Pueblo. This is the district that Boebert abandoned because she was afraid of getting beat. Unlike the more populous and prosperous Front Range, this district has 31% of the population on Medicaid.

Of course, the promise in the letter is contingent on the interpretation of “vulnerable populations” and also on how afraid Hurd and the other 11 co-signers are of Trump’s threats come budget reconciliation time. Here are the other cosigners:

Republican Rep

District

PVI

David Valadao

CA-23

R+1

Don Bacon

NE-2

D+3

Jefferson Van Drew

NJ-2

R+5

Rob Breshnahan

PA-8

R+4

Juan Ciscomani

AZ-6

EVEN

Jen Riggans

VA-2

EVEN

Young Kim

CA-40

R+1

Rob Wittman

VA-1

R+3

Nicole Malliotakis

NY-11

R+10

Nick LaLota

NY-1

R+4

Andrew Garbarino

NY-10

R+6

If 2026 is a wave election driven in part by Medicaid cuts, these guys are all out the door. Let’s see how seriously they want to hold on to their seats.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Kay W.1 year ago

I wonder why they phrased it as “could contain Medicaid cuts” The “blueprint” DOES contain huge Medicaid cuts. Medicaid cuts will have to be removed. Pritzker, who I am starting to like a lot, has been screaming about this.

Avatar

Tam R1 year ago

The way they did the initial budget they basically said that X billion comes out of this block and that block contains Medicare and Medicaid funding. They didn’t specify so they could continue to lie and say no cuts to Medicare or Medicaid.

Pritzker has been my favorite for a long time. He also has fuck you money which helps.

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

I just finished watching Biden’s speech on this topic. I don’t know whose idea it was to send him out there, but it was not great. Just let the fucking guy enjoy his retirement already, and find someone else to carry the message.

Avatar

Scott H1 year ago

Should Hurd hold a town hall, that should be the first question asked: "Define what you mean by vulnerable populations" and then see how he weasels out of answering the question.

It's interesting to look at the county map of results for CO-3: https://results.enr.clarityelections.com/CO/122598/web.345435/#/summary

My guess is that any change in results will be determined by turnout and I don't mean like we've assumed for all these years: increased turnout favors Dems. Like everything else these days, the world's turned upside down.

For example, last year, 397,553 votes were cast for House rep in CO-3. In 2022, its was 327,285. Like it or not, the Orange Fart Cloud gets (awful) people to vote (for him).

I didn't look at 2020 because the district's boundaries were different.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

Pueblo is a big mover in that district and Pueblo County went Biden 43K, Trump 42K in 2020, and swung to Trump 43K Harris 39K in 2024 so big swing red and lower turnout. So there's a case for a slight move towards Trump and a lot of Dems staying home, at least in that one county.

Avatar

C P1 year ago

You know, I don't know Murkowski specifically's record on gun rights, but I have zero fucking sympathy for people who have spent the last fifty years campaigning on the claim that guns are important because people who feel oppressed might have to shoot politicians, suddenly being afraid because of some hazily defined "retaliation."

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

Yup. I can't imagine that she supported any kind of gun control.

Avatar

Scott H1 year ago

Well, she did support this: https://www.alaskasnewssource.com/2022/06/24/murkowski-votes-bipartisan-gun-safety-bill-sullivan-votes-no/ As gun control goes, it's weak sauce but that's the climate we live in. She's gotten an "A" from the NRA for years but that slipped to a "B" after her support of the above bill.

Avatar

Sepideh M1 year ago

She represents a state with a rural population and large wild animals so I will forgive her. NRA has downgraded her score to a B.