I’m writing about this:

Here’s his follow up:

Garcia is Washington Bureau Chief at The Independent, and I follow him to get a flavor for better-than-average DC conventional wisdom. Unfortunately, his use of “nut cutting” in this case is completely wrong. I don’t use that term, or if I do when I write a post, I always prefix it with “As Dick Nixon would have said” because Nixon liked to use that term, as he did many other profane terms, because he was an asshole and mostly assholes talk about “nut cutting”.

Before I go on, I should note that I’ve actually seen a nut cutting. My wife is from a family of farmer/ranchers who would never call it a nut cutting. They’d call it “working cattle”. Nut cutting — turning a bull into a steer — is just part of it. They also do a bunch of other vet care when they have the young bull in a crush. It’s pretty brutal, but cattle are bred to be very resilient, plus they are also quite stupid. Unless we’re going to stop eating meat, nuts will be cut, because bulls are hard to manage and don’t yield good meat.

Back to the expression: Garcia is using it incorrectly because nut cutting is not a “trim” — it is transformational for the bull that undergoes it. The expression is really a variant of “come to Jesus moment”, “time to get serious” or other phrases indicating that a difficult but important decision is needed.

That said, in one way, Garcia is using the expression correctly, because if Democrats approach the Trump cleanup with a mentality of “gosh, we had better not do anything good because we have to raise taxes and do some austerity to handle the national debt” it will truly be transformational. We’ll transform ourselves into a losing party.

How to deal with the Trump debt is a question that will require multiple blog posts, but I have a few thoughts.

First, taxing the rich won’t fix the problem, but it’s a hell of a good start. There’s no way that Democrats should come into office and make the national debt our first priority. As long as we’re shaving away at it, good enough.

Second, cutting defense won’t fix the problem, but we will need to be smart about digging ourselves out of the hole that Trump will leave after expending all of our expensive munitions in the stupid Iran war. It’s clear that using six- or seven-figure missiles to shoot down four- or five-figure drones is a losing strategy, and we need some form of drone offense and drone defense instead of the current expensive path we’re on. Also, cancel the stupid “Trump class” battleships, and have a top-to-toe audit of our defense procurement with the aim of cutting waste. I’m sure we can wring a few billions out of that budget.

Third, I’d love to see the numbers on cutting out or reducing insurance middlemen in our incredibly expensive healthcare system.

That’s just a start. Garcia clearly wants to replay the same tired old DC playbook that’s trotted out every time Democrats are in power. As soon as we take office, all of a sudden the national debt is a pressing issue. We can’t let that happen.

If you’ve read this far, here’s a funny video from Kyle Clark on the subject of nut cutting. He uses the term correctly, btw.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

C P3 months ago

Amazing how it's always the next Democratic president who has to do some nut-cutting. Never the next Republican.

Amazing how we're always scolded about thinking we can solve all our problems by raising taxes on the rich and cutting defense spending, but Republicans are never scolded for thinking they can solve all our problems by cutting foreign aid and social programs.

"Oh no, we can't solve all our problems by cutting defense." Well, can we fucking do it anyway? We've essentially abandoned every military commitment to an ally we've had for the last seventy five years. So just shut down the bases, disband most of the forces that used to man them, and scrap a couple carriers. Will it help? It'll be a start!

"Oh no, we can't solve all our problems by not taxing the rich." Considering that they essentially pay nothing right now, let's start there all the same!

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur3 months ago

Fuckin' A!

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur3 months ago

Also we're purchasing a new fleet of icebreaker ships for $7 billion (today's price, who knows what it'll actually be) while the ice is melting. Make it make sense!

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/other/trump-is-spending-7-billion-on-11-arctic-ships-the-coast-guard-didnt-ask-for/ar-AA29tlSO

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur3 months ago

Ball gargling thundertwats!

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur3 months ago(edited)

Recently watched this heartbreaking, but fascinating, documentary on PBS

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_and_Water

"Zachary Lee of RogerEbert.com gave the film three and a half out of four stars and wrote, "Time and Water is very much a project trying to capture memory, time, and history, even as it melts before your eyes. I shudder to think that after the film's premiere at Sundance, what the condition of Iceland's glaciers may look like now."[8]"

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur3 months ago

Half kidding, but maybe we can also appeal to the vanity of the wealthy and hand out some kind of national award to those who pay their taxes when we finally go from a regressive system to a progressive one. Fluffing seems to work on a lot of of the whiny ass titty babies.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur3 months ago

When we get the Kennedy Center back.

Avatar

Kay W.3 months ago

First reverse both the Bush II and Trump tax cuts. Then reduce military spending by at least 1/3 Now you have the credibility to ask for concessions from the public. Has to be in that order Once 1 and 2 are complete we can discuss where to cut elsewhere, but not before 1 and 2 are complete.

Avatar

Sepideh M3 months ago(edited)

Defund the ICE private prisons and all their military cosplay.

Avatar

Kay W.3 months ago

Our prison sentences are way too long. We should bring them in line with the rest of the world. Reduce every federal sentencing guideline by 1/3 and no federal funding for state sentences that are longer than federal sentences.

Avatar

Sepideh M3 months ago

State sentences get federal funding?

Avatar

Kay W.3 months ago

They do, and so do police and prosecutors. They get “grants”

Avatar

C P3 months ago

A hell of a lot of the security/police state needs to be torn down and rebuilt smaller, frankly. ICE is the most egregious examples, but half those places don't in fact need all the bells and whistles they have.

Avatar

Sepideh M3 months ago

Yeah, allowing the military industrial complex to sell surplus to local police forces is not great.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur3 months ago(edited)

1990s I printed out a Common Dreams article about that and left on my boss's chair with his other presentation materials for his imminent Fraternal Order of Police attorney meeting 😆

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur3 months ago

Avatar

Busted Knee3 months ago

Anything good for social security can't even get through the Democratic party in it's current form. Income inequality and retirement fund inequality means that the vast majority of people are going to need larger social security payments and earlier. That, along with UHC and UBI are goals we need to be serious about.

On drones. We have been investing in them. But the companies making the new generation of smaller drones are all Palmer Luck, Elon Musk, Peter Theil, Mark Adrensen Silicon Valley linked. So this is shoveling more money at the same people trying to over throw the government and create Network State Libertopia. Any talk about defense or intelligence budges is going to have to talk about how much we can trust who we are feeding money to. Because the California tech cartel wants to run the nation through tech.

Avatar

David J3 months ago

I've been waiting for you to return to this issue. A couple of months you had a post about a piece of legislation Senator Van Hollen was sponsoring. Your take was wrongheaded in my opinion. I would encourage to look at the entirety of the plan and not just the single piece of legislation Van Hollen sponsored. You can read about it here:

https://patrioticmillionaires.org/priorities/

They also have a pdf linked on the front page that outlines the plan. The plan is comprehensive and addresses many of the pressing issues on the revenue side of this problem. Mainly it's about addressing wealth inequality.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor3 months ago

So that plan is Van Hollen’s plan? Just trying to clarify. Thanks

Avatar

David J3 months ago

It is not Van Hollen's plan. The organization recruited him and others to sponsor legislation. The plan includes four separate bills. It is being advertised as taxing the rich, paying the people, and spreading the power.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor3 months ago

Thanks I'll take a look.

Avatar
Avatar

TBone Dinosaur3 months ago(edited)

I'm a millionaire (only on paper though, and depending on teh markets) and I would not be miserable paying more for everyone to have nice things and a representative government.

Avatar

Busted Knee3 months ago

Millions come and go. Most people in my family have millions. Those who do not were wiped out by cancer or extended family bills and had to start over from scratch in their 40s or even 50s when getting a job is not easy. The minor millionaires are just as class and wealth obsessed as the billionaires right up until they get wiped out. I've find that smaller millionaires are often nastier than the 9 figure crowd as they are terrified of competition from below them in a way the richer ones aren't.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur3 months ago

I hope J.W. goes over this summary of legislation, I'm interested to know what he thinks!