New Dem initiative in Texas, from the WSJ:

❝

Democrats are launching a multimillion-dollar effort, helped by megadonor George Soros, to turn Texas into a political battleground after suffering through decades of electoral losses in the nation’s second-largest state.

Texas Majority PAC, a Soros-funded PAC, launched a “Blue Texas” initiative Monday along with the Texas Democratic Party and a group of county parties, aiming to organize tens of thousands of volunteers, recruit candidates and boost turnout ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Texas has been a Republican stronghold for decades, providing the GOP with its largest batch of electoral votes and supporting President Trump in each of the past three presidential elections. The growth in the state’s Hispanic population during the past two decades has raised hopes among Democrats, but those demographic shifts have done little to change the balance of power. Earlier organizing efforts by Democrats, such as through a group called Battleground Texas, have failed to yield significant results.

The Blue Texas project will work with state and county parties to recruit candidates and sign up volunteers, starting with a series of organizing rallies in June. Organizers plan to visit more than two dozen cities in July to recruit candidates.

“If a win is on the table in 2026, we don’t want to leave it there by not being organized,” said Katherine Fischer, the deputy executive director of Texas Majority PAC. The PAC has supported a group of city council and school board candidates who won election this year.

Texas Majority, the Texas Democratic Party and the nearly dozen county parties under the Blue Texas alliance collectively spent about $35 million in the 2024 election cycle, and organizers said they expect to exceed that amount through the partnership.

The group hopes a sustained commitment to building volunteers and get-out-the-vote efforts will help in next year’s Senate campaign, where incumbent Sen. John Cornyn faces a Republican primary challenge from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

Democrats face a shrinking pathway to winning 270 electoral votes if they fail to compete in growing Sunbelt states, Fischer said. States such as Texas, Florida, North Carolina and Arizona—all carried by Trump in 2024—have seen population growth and are expected to add electoral votes, while reliably blue California and New York have experienced a decrease in population and will likely lose electoral votes.  

“There is no choice for Texas or for anyone else in the country who wants to see a Democrat in the White House after 2032 but to find a pathway through Texas,” Fischer said.

Texas Majority Pac won a bunch of city council and school board races this year, so there is SOME evidence that organizing efforts in Texas are working.

I think it’s really, really important for Democrats to compete in both Texas and Florida. Democrats should be at least somewhat competitive in huge states with big urban areas and very diverse populations. Running away from Texas and Florida is just not acceptable. We have to figure out why we’re losing non-white, non college voters in these states because we cannot win nationally solely on the college educated vote.

This isn’t a choice. We can’t walk away from a shrinking map or pretend it isn’t happening.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Linda Carruthers1 year ago

Excellent strategy. A political party that wants to win must field candidates and campaign everywhere. To do that money is needed for every State and local Party organisation. I can’t think of a better long term investment by Democrats than putting funds into decentralised Party organisations in every State and locality.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 year ago

Harris County, Texas shero:

'Her honors thesis was titled "Tiananmen or Tahrir? A Comparative Study of Military Intervention Against Popular Protest."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Hidalgo

We can do it. Maybe not overnight. Maybe not in 2026. Nevertheless.

Avatar

Scott H1 year ago

Finally, somebody's gonna actually see those sweet, sweet Soros Bucks we've been hearing about for decades!

In all seriousness, in order for this to actually work, it needs to be a 24/7/365 operation that's in the public's face 24/7/365.

We have to figure out why we’re losing non-white, non college voters in these states because we cannot win nationally solely on the college educated vote.

Butbutbut, astute, always-wrong commenters elsewhere, part of the Ezra Broder Klein/MattY/Smith/Stancil/Pritchard/Atlantic/Vox types will tell us that's simply catering to only whites in their effort to reframe the issue and hide their incredibly racially tone deafness and even more incredibly classist outlook on what the Dem party should be.

Which opens us up to right wing populist attacks we have no answer to and costs us elections.

Avatar

Sepideh M1 year ago

Boulder's response to the molotov cocktail guy could be it.

All the politicians showed up for the Jewish festival. And it may be too soon to discuss how a group that was waving the flag of Israel on the Pearl St Mall every weekend for a year was making a lot of people uncomfortable, but this will probably not be discussed at all because it is easy to throw pro-Palestinian groups under the bus than it is to limit the part of pro-Israel discourse that will not "feel safe" until the Palestinians are wiped out.

There were TWO resolutions to denounce the molotov cocktail guy, and one of them decided that praising ICE was the way to go.

Our Democratic Congressman voted for both. https://jonathancohn.medium.com/a-tale-of-two-resolutions-75-dems-join-gop-in-resolution-praising-trumps-mass-deportation-regime-15cf590770ea

Opposing Republican clown foolishness that conflates anti-immigrant sentiment and support of the Jewish community should not be hard, and yet it is so hard.

Avatar

Scott H1 year ago

We had a lengthy "conversation" elsewhere this morning on this and yeah, I pointed out that your Democratic Congressman, who lives in a +40 district, voted for the "ICE! ICE! BABY!!!" one.

And, of course, we were met with the usual "why are you shitting on Democrats you purity ponies" followed up with the usual justification by some if said Dems who voted for it live in "divided" districts...which of course ignores what many of us pointed out in the first place, ie., +40 ain't no "divided" district.

Another CO rep, MM's rep, lives in a +14 district and voted for it.

These kinds of votes aren't binding but represent a moral stance of the Dem Party that they clearly minimize.

Someone did point out that maybe those votes reflect the demographic of the district, ie., white and affluent, meaning "WE FEAR CRIME AND SWARTHY PEOPLE!!!!!!" or they're afraid the right will call them "pro illegal immigration" or something.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

Beehiiv is still having technical issues related to an issue with their upstream provider, Heroku. The outage is affecting many other sites, also.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 year ago

Thanks for that info and effort M.M.

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

As a former long time resident of Florida, it’s going to be a tall order to be competitive there. The FL Democratic Party has been lost for decades, as Betty Cracker can attest.

However, that doesn’t mean they should give up on Florida. They just have to try something that will actually work there.

Avatar

Kay W.1 year ago

I have no clue what to do in Texas or Florida, but a growing political party doesn’t run away from 55 million people. We need to find people who DO know, and are not in denial.

Avatar

Scott H1 year ago

Is this something akin to OFA?

Except in this case, it won't back up and go away the nanosecond it's candidate was elected. Touted as "the way" to ensure (D) dominance, well, we see how that turned out, again, because it never hung around afterwards.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 year ago

My earlier comment was kidnapped:

As a former Texas resident, I say

LFG!!!