Thomas Massie introduced articles of impeachment [pdf] for Pete Hegseth, and he did a good job. It hits the big points:

  1. Ignoring the War Powers Act and prosecuting the Iran War (Articles 1-3).

  2. Ignoring laws to minimize civilian casualties, including those at the school in Iran. (Article 4)

  3. Extrajudicial killings of the fishermen in the Caribbean. (Article 5)

  4. Suppressing free speech, specifically of Senator Mark Kelly. (Article 6)

  5. Kidnapping Maduro. (Article 7)

  6. Pursuing an unlawful war in Yemen. (Article 8)

One could argue that Trump ordered all of this, and I’m sure Hegseth will do that if there’s a trial in the Senate. Or, Hegseth might just not show up, or be non-responsive and argumentative if he does. Everything he does will be bad for him and the Trump administration, politically.

But let’s get back to Trump directly ordering or indirectly tolerating this. Jon Gruber at Daring Fireball, who’s basically a Mac fanboy, has been following the story of Jensen Huang, the CEO of Nvidia, getting played in a Chinese honeytrap. He points out this part of a NYT story:

❝

Despite his status as an A.I. pioneer and head of one of the world’s most valuable companies, Mr. Huang was initially left off the list of major business and tech executives invited to join Mr. Trump in China. It is unclear whether the exclusion was connected to the memo. By that point, a number of people inside the administration were concerned about Mr. Huang’s influence on the president’s policy of only lightly regulating A.I., people briefed on the matter said.

After Mr. Trump saw media coverage about Mr. Huang being absent from the delegation, the president asked him to join the trip by meeting Air Force One during a layover in Alaska. The president drafted a social media post saying that it was an honor to have “the Great Jensen Huang,” and other business leaders “journeying to the Great Country of China where I will be asking President Xi, a Leader of extraordinary distinction, to ‘open up’ China so that these brilliant people can work their magic.”

Trump is a fool who can be easily played. Jensen Huang played him, and he was, in turn, played by a Chinese spy who transferred Nvidia chips to China.

Democrats have two years where they can pass legislation that Trump will veto, but also bring Trump’s cabinet to justice. It’s going to be a bridge too far to impeach Trump. But impeaching Hegseth and (dios mediante) RFK Jr are definitely not a bridge too far.

What Democrats need to do is to show that Trump endangered the security of our nation by appointing a completely unqualified Secretary of Defense. “The markets” will deal with Jensen Huang, I hope. What’s important is to pick issues that will demonstrate that Trump’s gross incompetence, and the incompetence of his cabinet, endangered our country and killed innocents. Hegeseth’s impeachment is a start, and whatever you think of Thomas Massie, he’s kicked it off competently.

If you don’t think you’re mad enough about Pete Hegseth, watch this:

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

r po43 minutes ago

"It’s going to be a bridge too far to impeach Trump."

Impeachment is a tool to get Trump gone. There are other tools, starting with impeaching Hegseth and anybody else vulnerable, and get them gone. Then there's the oversight committees. Pull all the top MAGA players in, make 'em testify, and go to lawfare on those who resist, in any way. Externally, many, I bet, would be quite curious to hear what Musk would say under oath. Then Zuck, and all the rest. There's a handy list to start with: the biggest oh say 20 donors to Trumps building projects. All of this is noise. It's a steady chipping away; a war of attrition. MAGA players need to go to prison. They need to lose their careers, and even, OMG, I can't believe I'm saying this in the US of A, their investments.

There is no silver bullet. Only work.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 hour ago

"...what would it look like if Democrats were to deploy maximal power against the administration next year? To escalate, Democrats would likely have to test one or all of the following approaches:

• Inherent contempt, a rarely invoked mechanism that allows Congress to imprison or otherwise penalize people who defy lawful commands.

• Impeachment, which threatens executive branch officials with the prospect of removal and places Congress at the height of its constitutional authority.

• The power of the purse, which allows Congress to place conditions on the money it authorizes the government to spend." ...

Longish read but a good one

https://newrepublic.com/article/217755/trump-plan-evade-accountability-democrats-oversight

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 hour ago

[The difficulty presented by Inherent Contempt] "... is why we think Democrats should be prepared to deploy the impeachment power promiscuously—including against Trump’s most controversial Cabinet officials. To give just one example, they should seriously contemplate impeaching Attorney General Todd Blanche for his corrupt prosecutions of Trump critics and for concealing important chunks of the Epstein files. This would be justified on the merits, but it would also maximize Congress’s investigative power over the Justice Department, where all sorts of malfeasance surely remains hidden from view."

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 hour ago

"Representative Adam Smith, a moderate from Washington state who’s the incoming Armed Services Committee chair, backs impeaching Trump. Smith told us he anticipated that Democrats from swingy or red districts and states will be reluctant to support impeachment proceedings. “I know this will be very difficult for a lot of my colleagues,” Smith said. “But Trump has simply become so dangerous that it needs to be done.”

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 hour ago

Each powers bullet point is discussed at length, persuasively

"In the end, we think that Democrats who resist this sort of approach will be susceptible to a combination of factors: public pressure, Trump’s escalating lawlessness, and cajoling from more energetic peers. Leaders who believe we’re still in the midst of crisis, and who feel pained when Democrats shrink from challenges, should prod reluctant colleagues to join them.

Indeed, we think these energetic Democrats should formally organize for what’s coming by creating Fight Caucuses—one in the House, one in the Senate. ... A Fight Caucus in the House could do the same. It can demand enforceable concessions from Jeffries, who will want a free and easy path to the speakership. We similarly hope that outside advocacy groups—existing ones, or new ones—will treat constitutional hardball as a litmus test that Democrats must meet, no less than support for abortion rights, universal health care, or environmental protection."

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur50 minutes ago

The advance prophylaxis gambit I wish for!

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 hour ago

Ya know who else does extrajudicial executions in addition to the military? ICE and DHS.

Homan is a little bitch and I hope we get Bovino too, before any statutes toll.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 hour ago

And their little dogs too!

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 hour ago(edited)

It's nice that Massie didn't "dumb down" his Articles to cull them into something too simple and easy to defend this time (like only two Articles ahem).

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 hour ago

"Since 2023, Steve Cohen is the only Democrat in Tennessee's congressional delegation. Cohen will retire from the House in 2027 after announcing that he would not run for re-election in 2026 due to the Tennessee redistricting.[1]"

No fucks left to give:

https://cohen.house.gov/media-center/enewsletters/introducing-26-articles-impeachment-againt-president-donald-trump

(back in September)

Avatar
Avatar

TBone Dinosaur2 hours ago

The Revenge Tour necessitates that someone even worse will be installed in place of anyone impeached and convicted (removed); therefore, I'm in favor of going straight for the jugular of the Commander in Chief. Impeaching Dotard, if it accomplishes nothing else, will at least keep him busy on defense and add another indelible, monumental stain on his "legacy." Even though he'll make more money on it, he's gonna do that anyhow every which way.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 hour ago

Just like Hagueseth urged, demoralize him even if only temporarily. Then do it again.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 hour ago(edited)

Just think who's really going to be doing the choosing: Stephen Miller! Ugh

And Natalie???

Avatar

David J2 hours ago

I think it's fair that Massie be thanked and considered an ally in the matter of impeaching Hegseth, just as he was with respect to being an important ally in releasing the Epstein files. Impeaching Hegseth and Kennedy would be a smart and effective move as a harm reduction strategy. The rats are already jumping ship at DOJ. Four Senate confirmed officials have resigned since the mid-terms. I guess they don't want to provide any more evidence for a possible disbarment case.

Jane Coaston interviewed Congressman Robert Garcia recently and he talked about some of the planning and coordination going on in the House to hold hearings to get the accountability ball rolling.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ome-JcSoIZc

tl;dr Stephen Miller is at the top of his list.

Avatar

Kay W.2 hours ago

Agree. Go Massie. The impeachment article on the 1st A violation is interesting. I’m pleased he included it.