Jared Polis is on a veto spree and I wanted to point one out, not because it’s surprising, but rather because it’s such an obvious betrayal of the concept of freedom that supposedly underlies libertarianism.

❝

House Bill 25-1291 aimed to increase safety for passengers, including optional audio and visual recording during rides and a ban on drivers offering their passengers food and drink. It would have also added some new background check requirements and allowed a person to sue, instead of going to arbitration, a company or driver in the case of death, sexual assault, personal injury or kidnapping.

The bill was sponsored by Rep. Jenny Willford, a Northglenn Democrat who said she was sexually assaulted by a Lyft driver last year. Prosecutors charged the man who allegedly attacked her earlier this month. Willford is also suing Lyft over the incident. 

I know someone who took a Lyft ride in Denver and was harassed by the driver. It didn’t get to the point of assault, thankfully. So, data and anecdotal evidence both point to a problem with a service that lightly vets drivers before putting them in a position where they can drive around potential victims.

Uber threatened to leave the state if the bill was passed. Polis’ statements about vetoing the bill referenced the possibility of those ride services leaving the state.

Is it freedom to have a duopoly leverage their control of the market to extort the population of a state when their representatives seek to regulate them? I think it’s the opposite — it’s a form of slavery to corporations.

Gig economy ride services have convinced their investors and also a lot of politicians that they’re a big, complex, indispensable app. They’re not. There’s no reason that Lyft or Uber couldn’t be replaced by some other not-very-highly funded startup in Colorado. As I’ve mentioned before, there’s a company in Canada called Uride that has a successful ride-hailing business in two dozen smaller towns there.

If Uber exited Colorado, a similar company could swoop in, and they’d be abled to recruit from a large pool of experienced drivers immediately. It would be a month or two of turmoil, but in the end, we’d all be hailing rides in Colorado on a different app. I’m sure Uber would do its best to make the transition seem as difficult as possible, but in the end, the invisible hand would have slapped them down for their intransigence.

Instead, Polis crumpled under pressure because he only values the freedom of corporations to do whatever the hell they want. That’s 21st-century libertarianism in a nutshell. Freedom for people with money, and fuck everyone else.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

tam1MI 1 year ago

I feel like we are constantly playing Whack-a-Mole with these types in the party. No sooner do we send Andrew Cuomo packing* than Joe Manchin and Kristen sinema rear their ugly heads, and no sooner do we get shut of them then Jared Polis ascends to power. It's frustrating as hell.

  • And he looks fair to crawl out of his political grave and afflict us once again...
  • Avatar

    Scott H1 year ago

    A quote from an unnamed Dem locally on our glibertarian, techbro governor in a piece a couple of months back about his legacy and where he might go from here:

    In the words of a seasoned Democratic strategist, “He’s young, wealthy, and likes to be in the arena, so I assume he will dip his toe into the presidential waters on the theory that a libertarian, tech-bro, oligarch-adjacent, free-market Democrat might actually have a lane.”

    Let's hope not. I'm kinda surprised he's not been invited to WelcomeFest. He'd more than fit right in.

    Avatar

    Tam R1 year ago

    Why do you comment here? Is it just so you can go over to B-J and tell them how terrible we are?

    Avatar

    Busted Knee1 year ago

    It's not libertarianism it's educated professional social liberalism. The crimes are justified as they allow the professionals to float above the rest. The crimes are demanded as they allow the wealthy to back social liberalism. You cannot fix this and still tolerate the upper middle class or allow social liberalism to be seen as a positive about someone. The moment you allow either this is what you are going to fucking get.

    The only solution is flattening the upper middle class as much as the wealthy and no longer allowing any social values to be a badge of character. Upper middle class whites with graduate degrees are not going to allow this.

    We've fucked ourselves by allowing that class to grow in power where there are two ways out. Full on fascism this time with nuclear bombs or a souped up French revolution with an ocean of blood. The issue is not Trump. The issue is what comes after and that should scare the shit out of everyone.

    Avatar

    mister mixAuthor1 year ago

    I don't see how the politics of this works. What's the annual income of an upper middle class person in your view?

    Avatar

    TBone Dinosaur1 year ago

    I posit that the scammers, crooks, thieves, and grifters that proliferate with the AOK of this admin. don't always have need of a college education and are a bigger "upper middle class" problem.

    Exhibit A: https://www.theleechclinic.com/10-indications-leech-therapy/

    There are mobile Leech Clinicians now. I mean, again hahaha. Just saw a van advertising leech therapy.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jqFibmmXz5Y

    Avatar

    Busted Knee1 year ago

    I'd say the top 20%. Same that owns 93% of the stock market. You can't talk about the top 1% and not talk about the top 20%. You can't talk about Wall Street CEOs and yet ignore that's why New York is a rich and donor state, that the most predator firms there had DEI programs and were the most inclusive places to work with MORE FEMALE EXCUTIVES ALSO WE HAVE PRIDE!!!!!!!! You can't get past that good liberal, very socially liberal Democrats staff them and all have a college education.

    Is it a shame that a billionaire who runs those owns a yacht while people starve? Yeah but it's also a shame that a worker there buys fancy food and vacations in Europe while looting other places and making good money. The educated professionals are just the enforcers of the billionaires no more and no less. I've worked at some of the biggest consulting, tech, and legal firms and I know who is there. Caving to Trump was the same as Pink Hats putting kids in cages because 200k and I have a degree.

    Avatar

    mister mixAuthor1 year ago

    In 2023, the cutoff for top 20% is somewhere around 160K. Now where I'm sitting at the moment, $160K is good money for a family of 4. In a major metro, it's doing OK but not great -- certainly not upper-middle class.

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/203183/percentage-distribution-of-household-income-in-the-us/

    Avatar

    Sepideh M1 year ago

    This says "I don't know the difference between one billion dollars and one million dollars" to me.

    There were people collecting all the pride merchandise from the military industrial complex, and it was hilarious. There are a lot of things on the internet making fun of Raytheon pride.

    Avatar

    Scott H1 year ago

    Uber and Lyft have been massive funders of white market urbanism groups the kind that adore glibertarians techbros like Polis.

    These gig companies are the new U.S. Steel, Pullman, and Standard Oil. They are just as anti-union and just as exploitative as any of those Gilded Age corporations. Just as evil too.

    Avatar

    mister mixAuthor1 year ago

    Loomis at LGM makes the point that the gilded age is a better comparison than the 3rd reich for Trumpism. I agree that the gig economy is one example.

    Avatar

    Pacem Appellant1 year ago

    Apropos, Uber/Lyft didn't like that the California government was all set to declare their drivers employees of their company and therefore entitled to certain benefits. So they bankrolled a ballot proposition that overruled the will of the legislature. Our ballot proposition system is broken, and a comfortable majority of the electorate were easily coaxed into believing that the government didn't have gig workers best interests in mind.

    Avatar

    Sepideh M1 year ago

    Wouldn't Uber and Lyft drivers make more money if they are driving you to the burbs? Wouldn't urbanism reduce demand for their services?

    Avatar

    Scott H1 year ago

    Exact opposite. They support everything in the general 'War on Cars' because that leaves them as the default car provider. Entitled white urbanists against private cars want streets cleared for ubers. This is one of the more direct takes shilling for uber/lyft.

    Inner core of cities are being messed with in order to give priority to a so-called ‘mode of transportation’ that people use (or desire) the absolute least. Which begs the question, why would govt encourage conflict for the most fragile way to get around?

    Because “ride share” VCs like Uber/Lyft are the beneficiaries.

    https://gizmodo.com/a-small-war-over-bike-lanes-may-be-an-uber-and-lyft-con-1847795365

    Avatar

    The Limper1 year ago

    "That’s 21st-century libertarianism in a nutshell. Freedom for people with money, and fuck everyone else. " 20th-century libertarianism was also this - they just hid it better (I was a former card-carrying member of the Libertarian party. What happened to me? I realized it was all bullshit).

    Avatar

    mister mixAuthor1 year ago

    Yeah, I was giving them the benefit of the doubt. It seemed like the Ron Paul era libertarians were obsessed with weird stuff that wouldn't excite corporations, like the gold standard and printing their own currency, the Amero.

    Avatar

    Pacem Appellant1 year ago

    Was the Amero a real proposal? I've seen it occur in sci-fi fiction as a sort of joke/catch-all for a future currency that isn't the US dollar.