A woman known as Jane Doe 4 in the Jeffrey Epstein files is “staying off the grid” and lives in fear of retaliation from the Trump administration amid an escalating controversy over its handling of her case, according to a family member.

“Trauma is brutal. Chronic trauma destroys,” said the relative, who described the woman’s life as layers of abuse dating back to early childhood. “She’s coping as best she can.”

The woman had four interviews with FBI agents in 2019 that keep resurfacing in the Epstein sex-trafficking scandal. She made unproven allegations she was abused by the New York financier in the 1980s, then sexually assaulted by Donald Trump, when she was between 13 and 15 years old. The White House has called her allegations “completely baseless” and “backed by zero credible evidence”, a claim it said was supported by the fact that the Biden administration’s justice department knew about the allegations but “did nothing with them”.

She is one of the only alleged Epstein victims to have directly accused Trump, and irregularities in the justice department’s handling of her case files have now become a rallying point for critics of acting attorney general Todd Blanche, who is the US president’s nominee for permanent appointment.

A federal judge in Washington last week gave Blanche until 2 July to produce unredacted versions of files the justice department has already released, or provide an explanation for why it cannot produce the unredacted records. The Department of Justice (DoJ) was also ordered to release interview notes related to Jane Doe 4’s allegations. The decision was part of a civil case against Blanche brought by journalist Katie Phang.

Late Friday, the justice department’s number three official, Stanley Woodward, gave notice he will join the case. “They really, really don’t want these documents released,” tweeted Brendan Ballou, a lawyer for the Public Integrity Project, who is representing Phang.

I just checked the membership of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and both Cornyn and Tillis are on it. If either one votes against Blanche, it’s tied, and if both do, he’s toast. Waiting for any Republican to do the right thing is, of course, stupid, but, expecting one to fuck over someone who’s fucked them over isn’t totally dumb.

A couple of things about the story linked above. First, the fact that the Biden DoJ did nothing doesn’t really prove anything, since it did a lot of that (nothing). Second, considering the gravity of the Epstein story, perhaps the worst scandal that any President has ever been involved in, it’s notable that a British newspaper is doing a better job of covering it than our supposed “papers of record”. There’s nothing about Epstein on the front pages of either the Post or the Times.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading