Elise Stefanik represents R+9 NY-21 in New York, a district that went 60/40 Trump in the last election, and 62/38 for Stefanik. It’s the “north country” - encompassing the northern part of the Capitol Region and the Adirondacks. You’ll definitely see a lot of Trump flags in this area.

Still, I’m not overly surprised that Trump pulled her nomination as UN Ambassador in order to keep this seat. This was never going to be a gimme in a special election. Historically, those elections are hard-fought, well-financed and low-turnout. And Gov Kathy Hochul was supposedly going to slow-walk the special election to replace Stefanik. (Hochul herself won a special election to replace good Christian Republican Chris Lee when his shirtless selfies sent to his non-wife were revealed, in a very red district. She lost that seat in the next general election.) The candidate who was going to oppose Stefanik, dairy farmer Blake Gendebein, had already raised $2.5 million, just to show how much money pours into these elections, which sets him up to run a solid challenge against Stefanik next cycle. Also, the Republicans were having a fight over replacing Stefanik.

It is a sweet side-effect of Trump bowing to the obvious — this was only going to be a sure Republican win if he was popular, and he isn’t — is that Stefanik lost her leadership position in the House. She’s really one of the grossest Republican opportunists in Congress, flipping from a somewhat-reasonable Republican to a full MAGA mouthpiece in just a couple of years.

Supposedly the reason that Trump chickened out on Stefanik was the polls in the Florida race to replace National Group Texter Security Advisor Mike Waltz. Waltz held R+14 FL-6, a 64/34 Trump district in 2024. Waltz won that seat by a 67/33 margin. So this one really should be a gimme for Republicans, though some recent polling shows the race within the margin of error on a small-sample poll. Special elections are notoriously hard to poll, since they’re all about hard-to-predict turnout, but that poll clearly has Republicans worried.

The reasons that FL-6 is a problem are classic for a special election. The Democrat’s candidate, Josh Weil, raised $8.8 million, while the Republican candidate has roughly half a million dollars in the bank. And Republicans are already shitting on their candidate, Randy Fine, for running a poor campaign. (The Great Leader Trump couldn’t be to blame, of course.)

While it’s highly unlikely that Dems will flip FL-6, they also have FL-1, Matt Gaetz’ old district on the line in another their April 1 special election. This is an R+19 district, even more red that R+14, and I haven’t heard any rumblings that the Democrat, Gay Valimont, could pull off an upset.

A lot of the links above are from the excellent Downballot blog, which used to be Daily Kos elections. Here’s their Google sheet tallying up the special elections this year, and overall Democrats are out-performing Republicans by a pretty good margin.

Unfortunately, Democrats have some issues of our own with our two special elections for members who died in office. AZ-7, which is Raul Grijalva’s old seat, isn’t going to have its special election until September. It’s a D+15 district so it shouldn’t be an issue when the election finally happens. Grijalva died of lung cancer this month.

The special election for TX-18, which is a D+23 district in Houston, has no election date set yet, because Greg Abbott is Greg Abbotting and holding off on calling the election. This race is to replace Sylvester Turner, who died in office, who in turn replaced Sheila Jackson-Lee, who died in office. (Lee’s daughter finished her mother’s term so the district isn’t completely cursed.)

Both of these specials on the Democratic side were for people who had serious cancer diagnoses and still ran for their seats. Too bad, because right now Republicans are running scared.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

2liberal .1 year ago

Testing my new login ....

Avatar

Gloria DryGarden 1 year ago

Test comment

Avatar

Sepideh M1 year ago

I would like to register a complaint. Someone is starting a podcast and did not let the commenters of his blog know about it. We had to go read some other blog.

Uhm... Is becoming a podcaster the type of demotion that Stefanik is taking? Maybe you can invite her to be a guest. I hear that inviting Republicans worked out for Gavin Newsom. (I had to try to make my comment relevant, but I am just not good at it.)

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

Yeah, well, we've been working (read: talking about) the damn thing for a couple of months and finally got our act together enough to actually book a guest. I didn't know DougJ was going to blab about it today, we're not even taping until later next week. You guys will be the first to know when something real happens.

Avatar

Scott H1 year ago

It better be good, unlike virtually every podcast the same breathless commenters on "some other blog" recommend.

Otherwise, I'll be brutal. :)

Good luck.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

Don't get your hopes up.

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

You’ll be pleased to know that after John announced it over at BJ, a whole bunch of commenters decided to develop fortune telling abilities so they could determine that it would suck in advance.

“Another Bernie Bro podcast by a bunch of white guys.” LOL

Avatar

Scott H1 year ago

Of course the breathless commentators who's apparent entire news consumption is nothing but podcasts were eager for it. :)

I gotta say, your response to that quoted comment had me massively LOLing. ;)

Avatar

r po1 year ago

The semafor article and this one immediately imply an uncomfortable question: why are so many safe House seat D representatives insisting on running for a two year seat after they have been diagnosed with serious medical issues, into their 70s. How can their health not remotely be ignored as part of their qualifications to do their job (which is to sit in that seat and vote D).

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

You will get huge pushback from a lot of Democrats when you talk about age, health and ability to do the job. I know because many of those Democrats comment at Balloon Juice, and I was accused of "ageism" whenever I brought this stuff up. Also, in general, people love their representatives, so they don't want their rep to quit because they're too old (just reps in other districts).

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

It’s not even about age, it’s about ability.

Avatar

Scott H1 year ago

EvErYbOdY eLSe's rEp iS ToO oLd BuT MiNe iS JuSt FiNe!

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

How many other professions would allow something like this to happen?

People get put out to pasture or given a “special project” when there’s even a hint that they cannot perform their job.

Avatar

r po1 year ago

I know nothing about judges but there seems to be a way to put them out to pasture with "senior status" or some such that seems humane and amicable all around. Congressional Member Emeritus has a nice ring to it. Give them a very nice state room type setup and a whole bunch of board and card games and an open bar. Anybody in the media that wants to chat with them about their emeritus experiences are highly encouraged?

Avatar

Sepideh M1 year ago

There was that cranky judge in her 90s that just would not go. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/judge-in-her-90s-fights-colleagues-push-to-unseat-her-podcast

She was still trying to get the job back in December at age 97! https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/12/21/judge-pauline-newman/77065894007/

Avatar

tam1MI 1 year ago

Also, it's just so typical of the Republican party. A bunch of men screw up, and a woman takes the fall.

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

If Gabbard was as a more central figure in the group chat, they would have made an example of her. But since only men screwed up, there will be no consequences.

Avatar

tam1MI 1 year ago

I have to wonder if the reason that these clearly seriously ill Dems keep running for their seats doesn't have something to do with the quality of the health insurance they get as members of Congress.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

Yes and they have gold plated health care from the Capitol physician. Plus having a staff to do everything for them.

Avatar

Run Goose1 year ago

Two months into this monstrosity, it's a good sign that they are on the defensive electorally. Right now, it seems like the Dems now hold the advantage in off-year elections too.

I'm worried that this pressure will result in them cranking up their desperate salvos at the institutional foundation of the country, and the courts (the only remaining active bulwark) aren't quick enough or aggressive enough to protect what remains.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

This will almost certainly happen.