Let’s do something exciting today. Let’s talk… GDP!

Ok - for those of you who stuck around after that rousing opening sentence, I’ll start with a primer and go from there.

GDP = Gross Domestic Product. The formal definition of GDP according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is “Gross domestic product… represents the total value of final goods and services produced within a country during a specified time period, such as one year.”

GDP matters because it is perhaps the broadest measure of what an economy is producing. Growth in GDP means growth in economic activity. The idea of measuring GDP is that is can be an indicator of change (up or down) in other key economic areas such as jobs, wages, business income/profit, investment and government services (via tax revenue).

Historically, post WWII, the average annual growth in GDP is approximately 3.1%. This chart shows “Real GDP” growth - which takes inflation into account, for the post WWII period:

Growth in GDP (on average and also peak growth for individual years) has been declining over time, with early post-WWII years showing higher growth than more recent years. For example, average annual GDP growth from 1947 - 1979 was 3.71%, while 1947 - 2025 was only 3.08%, a decrease of 17% in the average.

Side Note: of course, Trump the con man, in his attempt to stay one step ahead of the carnage he’s created, has claimed the U.S. could see GDP growth of up to 20% under his watch. Hint: It’s. Not. Going. To. Happen.

In the U.S., solid GDP growth has become shorthand for the media and politicians to claim all is good with our economy.

Don’t listen to them.

Why? Because growth in GDP can - and is - distributed unevenly amongst different economic entities and classes.

Think of a corporation that grows rapidly, increasing sales, profits and cash flow from year to year. The corporation can use that free cash flow in different ways:

  1. It can hire more people to handle its growth and/or it can raise wages and pay bonuses to non-supervisory workers to reduce turnover and reward those workers.

  2. Alternatively, it can invest in the business - in capital and research/development - to give it a better chance of maintaining its success into the future.

  3. It can also reward its shareholders through increased dividends and share buybacks (which used to be illegal and considered stock manipulation), while also rewarding its top executives with gigantic compensation packages, side benefits like private jets and paying for executive’s tax bills, and stock options.

In Instance 1 and to some extend Instance 2 (if success with Instance 2 loop back to Instance 1), the fruits of growth are enjoyed by everyone who participates in making the organization successful. However, if the focus for the org’s management and board is using free cashflow mainly for Instance 3, then the corporation’s growth benefits only an elite few.

Unfortunately, in the post-Reagan U.S., and even more so in the Trump years, the benefits of GDP growth have gone mainly to those comprising Instance 3 - large corporations, their C-Suite executives and their shareholders.

Not coincidentally, increased worker productivity - while historically tracking with increased worker compensation - now goes mainly to corporations and the elite:

As GDP continues to grow, where do we stand as a country?

  • A Federal Reserve survey found 37% of Americans couldn't cover a sudden $400 expense with cash or cash equivalents

  • A US News survey found that 43% of Americans do’t have the funds to deal with a $1,000 emergency

  • A Zebra Insurance survey found 46% of respondents didn’t have enough savings to cover even a month of expenses

Not good. Where has all of that value of final goods and services produced ended up?

This chart pretty much tells the story:

Billionaires and the Epstein Class have more than they can ever spend in 1,000 generations, and they’re spending a shit ton of money today to ensure the rest of us continue to struggle while they buy their 10th home, 350-foot super yacht and private jet(s) all while building underground bunkers or securing visas (effectively, citizenship) in faraway places to protect themselves when everything falls apart.

So don’t let the GDP touters fool you. If the rules of the game are such that the benefits of growth aren’t distributed equitably amongst all of us, GDP growth is just another tool for the wealthy elites to live in their bubble world of luxury while nearly half of Americans struggle to get-by day-to-day, praying they don’t lose their job or buy medicine or need to fix their car.

This is the Republican scam and always has been - at least since the days of Reagan.

  • Actively make sure government does not work in the eyes of voters/citizens, then blame government and Democrats for government not working. Use that strategy to treat government as a personal piggy bank to enrich family, friends, donors and cronies.

  • Cut taxes on corporations and the wealthy to transfer wealth upwards (but always denigrate safety net programs that they claim unfairly transfer wealth downwards).

  • Promise that economic benefits will “trickle down” from the wealthy elite to working and middle-class Americans (hint: They. Never. Do.).

  • Ignore deficits and debt when in power to transfer wealth upwards but decry deficits and debt when Democrats are in control and attempt to reduce inequality.

  • Rile up low-information (i.e., ignorant) voters by bombarding them with cultural inanity such as trans people are threatening your kids and destroying our society, while immigrants are somehow the reason you're struggling economically and your life sucks (hint: It’s. Not. True.)

Sadly, it has worked. But it can only work for so long. We’ve got an economy of the elite, by the elite and for the elite. But history shows us that when inequality becomes too great, and opportunity fades way, that’s when the pitchforks come out.

Belatedly in honor of Dolly.

Dolly Parton - 9 to 5

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Joe M1 month ago

Lots of republicans like to go on about pining for the fjords 1950's but they never seem to mention the idea of what tax rates looked like then, particularly on the upper end. I wonder why that is?

Avatar

John S.1 month ago

Because they don’t want to remind everyone that when the wealthy were taxed, things were much better. And that would blow a giant hole in believing the tax cut fairy trickles down prosperity.

Avatar

Scott H1 month ago

America hates its children:

https://x.com/anthonyzenkus/status/2099138182293999790

Best quote and pertinent to this discussion:

‘Will somebody please think of the shareholders!’

Avatar

Sepideh M1 month ago

Oh, I have many things to say on this topic. You should email me.

Avatar

Kay W.1 month ago

The generational split in Abdul’s supporters is huge. This is Obama 08 level young/old division.

https://ippsr.msu.edu/news/msu-poll-shows-democrats-lead-republicans-coalesce-behind-rogers

I wonder how much of that is religion- based. Almost 40% of older voters say they are less likely to support a Muslim. That’s 40% who admit it. You could probably add 10 to that. It doesn’t really matter, the electorate is what it is, but the level of resistance to a Muslim, any Muslim, is about where I thought it would be.

Avatar

C P1 month ago

Honestly, the generation gap is a relief. My whole life has been defined by Muslims, probably more than any other ethnic group, being viewed as The Enemy. I don't think a religion's been stigmatized like this since the days of sky-high anti-Catholic and anti-semitic paranoia before World War Two.

So if the younger generations legitimately don't give a shit, that's hope for the future.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 month ago

"Actively make sure government does not work in the eyes of voters/citizens" -- this plus sowing an incredibly negative attitude towards any kind of change or improvement that's proposed by government or a politician. There's a certain kind of deep cynicism that pervades today's right-wing culture. They've convinced a lot of people that nothing can be better, ever, that their buying power will continue to decline and there's nothing that can be done. "It is what it is" and so on.

Avatar

C P1 month ago

This. I've thought for years that the greatest (as in most impactful) legacy of the Reagan Revolution wasn't making people believe in conservatism (something that basically went away in a generation, by the end of the Dubya era) but making them disbelieve in any possibility that politics could be use to change things for the better (something that hasn't gone away and is instead incredibly pervasive).

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 month ago

In which Roger Marshall gets properly flayed.

"This might be better than the "Ted Cruz sucks" video"

https://bsky.app/profile/dominicervolina.com/post/3mveko3zsou2m

Fuck that guy!

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 month ago

So satisfying with coffee.

("The crowd erupts in chants of "Shame on you!" as Roger Marshall tries to explain why he sued 700 of his patients, leading to 81 arrests:")

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 month ago

Excellent post, just top notch. Receipts galore and spot on.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 month ago

Any time is a good time for JPie! Another excellent screed to add to our Gross National Product:

https://digbysblog.net/2026/09/13/and-a-partridge-in-a-pie-tree/

Avatar

Joe is Wypoxic1 month ago

That may be the most succinct takedown ever!

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 month ago

It goes perfectly with your excellent title for this post!

Avatar

John S.1 month ago

Brutal takedowns sound better in the original English.

Avatar

Sepideh M1 month ago

Yesterday, while I was rotting my brain, I happened across this interview with an influencer who interviewed the doormen of New York City. The doormen were about to go on strike, and Mamdani showed up to the YouTube channel to bring more visibility to their cause.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oHtZoG0CPM

Avatar

Scott H1 month ago

Pope Francis said this about trickle-down in 2013:

“Some people continue to defend trickle-down theories which assume that economic growth, encouraged by a free market, will inevitably succeed in bringing about greater justice and inclusiveness in the world. This opinion, which has never been confirmed by the facts, expresses a crude and naive trust in the goodness of those wielding economic power and in the sacralized workings of the prevailing economic system. Meanwhile, the excluded are still waiting.”

Avatar

Scott H1 month ago(edited)

And of course the so-called "Abundance" agenda is just another rebranding effort of the same ole shit, aka Reaganism with ostensibly liberal PR words which can be summed up this way:

Trickle-down economics, bigotry, and selling our government to robber barons made our state slide into poverty, violence, and ignorance…but if we double down on all the above, the same shit that got us here might just save us!

Avatar

Scott H1 month ago

Three more very useful charts:

How the Marginal Tax Rate Evolved: https://flic.kr/p/2sABQNo

Union Membership Relating to Income Inequality: https://flic.kr/p/2sAw6Hu

and one everyone should study, the Neoliberal Goals Table: https://flic.kr/p/2sADiJ7

Avatar

Joe is Wypoxic1 month ago

Good points Scott. I've [ushed the top marginal tax rate thing forever. Average top marginal rate before Reagan was somewhere around 60% and above 90% for much of the mythical good old days of the 50s and 60s that reactionary Republicans pine for...

Also, declining union membership clearly coincides with increasing inequality...

Avatar

Busted Knee1 month ago

Unions r racist. Per our new Democratic party.

Avatar

Scott H1 month ago

We see that claptrap from the usual suspects in the usual online spaces.

Whites raised by anti-union white parents in lily white burbs.

The racism is sooooo much projection.

Avatar

Kay W.1 month ago

Good post (as usual). What I try to point out to people is how the money in politics situation has gotten dramatically WORSE since 2012. Huge chunks of our base just hand- wave it away as business as usual, but it’s really not. It’s much, much worse. Related- when did Jon Stewart get radicalized? He used to be a sort of cynical centrist. He’s on Tik Tok now ranting about billionaires and ME forever wars. He’s a Lefty! Its great! I salute him! But I wonder when he shifted Left. What specifically turned him.

Avatar

Sepideh M1 month ago

Did the 9/11 firefighter's fund radicalize him? He did a lot of work on that.

Avatar

Joe is Wypoxic1 month ago

Methinks that was a big part of it Sepideh...

Avatar

Busted Knee1 month ago

He openly said this was the case.

Avatar

C P1 month ago

I always said that Jon Stewart was a guy whose heart was in the right place but whose head was messed up by a lifetime of ingesting "both sides do it" propaganda.

Oftentimes in those struggles, the heart is what wins out, and I'm glad that's what happened here.