Graham Platner got a lot of attention with this:

❝

U.S. Senate candidate Graham Platner wants to eliminate the federal tax on gasoline and diesel fuel, freeze electric rates and fund clean energy developments, as part of his "Take Back American Energy" plan released Friday.

Gas taxes are 18.3 cents a gallon, and I’m fine with a moratorium on gas tax, if only to teach people that gas taxes are a drop in the bucket in a scenario where gas prices have gone up a couple of bucks. But there’s another approach that will do very little to address the high price of gas, but might address the deep and abiding public hatred of oil companies: tax their extra profits that come from the high price of oil. A so-called “windfall profits tax”, would simply tax back the extra money they made because the price of oil jumped due to the Iran war. I guess this isn’t populism, because even Platner isn’t suggesting it. It would be populism if you tell people that we’ll re-open the hospitals in their towns, or pay their SNAP benefits, from excess oil company profits.

Maybe a windfall profits tax is “slopulism”, a new term coined on BlueSky and other forums where self-anointed smart people decide to tell us dummies that some proposal that would be popular can’t really work. I really hate that term, because the people labeling proposals “slopulism” might be technically correct — for them, the best kind of correct — but who really cares if the “slopulist” proposal gets some political traction?

The reality is that when Democrats get some power and solve some problems, the solution is going to be a mishmash anyway. Take, for example, Mamdani’s latest video bragging — as he should — about closing New York City’s $12 billion budget deficit.

The “pied a terre” tax that all the billionaires were freaking out about was a small ($500 mil) piece of the $12 billion solution. The important part that people will remember is that Mamdani got it done without closing down libraries or making public school classes bigger. And they’ll also remember that some of that money came out of the hide of the rich.

Remember that next time someone beings a tedious “well ackshully” lecture about how taxing the rich, alone, won’t be enough to fund everything we need to fund in the US. Taxing the rich didn’t do the whole job in NYC, but it got a hell of a lot of attention.

Finally, let’s not forget that the ur-slopulist — cro-magnon slopulist man, if you will — one Donald J. Trump, is now our President for the second time. He’s horribly unpopular, not because of his slopulist policies, but because it’s becoming clear to even the dimmest Trump voter that he never had any intention of doing anything to make their lives better. It’s not the details of his slopulism, it’s the overall failiure to deliver.

People want to results, and they want some of those results to come out of the hide of the rich and the big corporations. The details don’t matter, and we’re not going to win unless we come up with some proposals that are popular. Politics just isn’t that hard unless you make it so.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Ken In MN6 months ago(edited)

Graham Platner read the room* and acted accordingly. Meanwhile the Pod Save Pod People want Democrats to come up with a ten-point plan, supported by a 100-page whitepaper, detailing the targeted tax cuts that will cost more in implementation than will deliver in benefits. In other words, do absolutely nothing to make anything better for those who need it, while not inconveniencing or hurting the delicate, snowflake-like sensibilities of their billionaire funders...

(*I must add that the room is full of morons who voted for the guy who promised to lower prices on Day One.)

Avatar

mister mixAuthor6 months ago

Gas taxes are a big deal in rural areas. Farmers are allowed to buy untaxed fuel in bulk, that is dyed red IIRC, to be used only on off-road equipment like tractors. My father-in-law, a farmer/rancher, had his own pumps and tanks for that. So the fact that they have all this infrastructure makes gas taxes top-of-mind for them.

So even though I think it is a dumb solution, I see why it was proposed by Platner, who needs to win rural Maine.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur6 months ago

"For Bernardo Francisco Moreno Mejía, whose personal fortune is tied to cocaine drug lords in his native Colombia and the fossil fuels industry, technological innovation and development is akin to cancer."

This fucking guy 🙄😤

Sen. Bernie Moreno: "Our bill completely hermetically seals the United States from any Chinese automobiles. I call it taking anti-cancer medication. That's what these Chinese cars are."

https://bsky.app/profile/robertscotthorton.bsky.social/post/3mlqfoocejs2i

What a d-bag

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur6 months ago

Semi-related skeet that I adore and I think of Kay when i read it (I keep going back to review because it makes me smile).

https://bsky.app/profile/bingley567.bsky.social/post/3mlotwae5xk2i

Avatar

Busted Knee6 months ago

I've seen people rooting for Platner to lose in the general as proof that next time we should go with their candidate and that all this populism will end. They also don't want these policies to succeed as that will take the focus away from social issues and create more populist candidates.

Avatar

Sepideh M6 months ago

I want Platner to win because it pisses off the establishment Democrats. I also want him to shut his mouth and not say stupid things.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur6 months ago

Also, as well, it's time to take off the kid gloves and cease subsidizing their pillaging and raping of our wallets and our planet.

https://www.imf.org/en/topics/climate-change/energy-subsidies

Avatar

Sepideh M6 months ago

Tax cuts proposed by Democrats at a time when the people in charge are looting the government are a complete nonstarter, and democrats need to stop.

Booker, Platner, Van Hollen, and others who are proposing tax cuts need to understand that government pays for things that we value. And things we value need to be paid for.

Even though Mamdani is saying he is balancing the budget through the tax on rich people houses, he is also considering delaying some pension payments. An actuary that I know in New York has opinions on underfunded pensions.

https://ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/politics/2026/04/23/mayor-mamdani-pension-proposal

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur6 months ago

I read yesterday that this doesn't apply to current pensioners, nor to those soon to retire. But kicking that can down the road for the next admin. to deal with is not optimal either.

Compromise is hard.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur6 months ago

Also read that NY State is all in on a ($8 billion, I think it said) grant to NYC which is mainly how the deficit will be reduced/budget balanced.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor6 months ago

None of the tax cut proposals that I saw from Democrats earlier this year included raising taxes on the rich and corporations. That's how you could tell they didn't mean it.

Avatar

Busted Knee6 months ago

They also need to knock off the no tax increases on 250k or 400k nonsense. Hit them hard in the wallet as well.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor6 months ago

Well at least you've backed down from mass extermination of that cohort. Baby steps.

Avatar

Busted Knee6 months ago

If we don't tax them they can get the billionaire treatment.