I linked to Molly Jong-Fast’s interview with Tim Walz in a post yesterday, but I there’s so much to mine here other than his comment about healthcare that I wanted to pull out the main points.

  • Walz wanted to talk to Jong-Fast because he had been on a mission to The Hague to meet with Phillips, which is building a plant in Minnesota. He notes the hunger of Europe to believe that not all Americans agree with Trump.

  • He says that, as a governor, right now the uncertainty feels like COVID to him. He notes that Mike Pence did all he could to help during that time, while acknowledging that it wasn’t great. There’s no Mike Pence now. The COVID analogy is something I want to write more about.

  • He notes that one of the first things the Trump administration did was defund Lutheran Social Services, which is associated with his synod, the ELCA. (For those of you who didn’t grow up around a lot of Lutherans, there are a ton of synods, but the big ones range from extremely conservative, the Wisconsin Synod, to moderate, the Missouri Synod, to his liberal synod, the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America.). The American Association of Geographers was also defunded. Walz doesn’t think this was specifically aimed at him, but he wonders, especially about Lutheran Social Services.

  • He believes that Democrats will be back in power, and when they are, people are going to expect universal health care. He makes the point that a one-vote majority is a majority. His message to Republicans: you are teaching us a lot of what we will do when we’re back in control. “We need to deliver for people, and that’s their downfall in this.” (Meaning: Republicans won't deliver shit.)

  • “You lead with good policy and politics will follow that.”

  • Jong-Fast throws him a question about the lack of Democratic media engagement. Walz, being Walz, takes ownership for his role in the loss, and acknowledges that he thought it was crazy to put Vance on every show, but he’s re-evaluating. He says that he thinks Dems left a void that Republicans filled.

  • Walz makes the point that Obama didn’t have charismatic resistance. “It was Boehner and Mitch McConnell.” He acknowledges that some of it was pushed by right wing media, but he says some of it was organic. He thinks that the current protest are similar. “At least get out there and throw some gas on it.”

  • He says that it’s good to hit on Republicans for lack of results, but when Democrats get in there, people are going to want some results. He doesn’t think all of the great work the Biden Administration did translated into the mainstream consciousness. He thinks that’s an issue of getting the message out.

  • “I’m an unabashed believer in a shadow government.”

  • He’s hard on himself for, in his mind, taking the bait on the eating dogs and cats line from Trump and Vance, and talking about it so much for a few days. He thinks it didn’t do a damn bit of good, electorally.

  • This, to me, is the most important part of the interview: He notes that people might not like him, but he’s way more popular in Minnesota than Trump, and that’s because they don’t have anything to gripe about. He’s delivering on school lunch, soon on family medical leave, on people who have healthcare. Governors should not just resist, but deliver on policies that are popular. “That’s why you lean in on this gun stuff. Seriously, we’re having discussion about bathrooms when you can’t keep guns out of the school?”

  • Molly says that what his handlers did wrong was not use him enough, and he switches the conversation to how they didn’t show enough of how great Kamala was, including her calming presence, especially with young people.

  • He understands why Democrats want to see their politicians do something. More on the shadow cabinet. Example: a shadow HHS secretary who says that measles are bad. He also suggests a daily briefing similar to what was done during COVID, from governors, explaining what’s going wrong.

  • Second most important point of the interview: Molly challenges him about a friend who said that free lunches are great but poor kids and poor moms don't vote. Walz responds that the free lunch was one of the biggest tax cuts middle-class people got. He hears from middle-class Republican-leaning moms that it was a big tax cut, and they have more time with their kids because they don’t have to make lunch. (The way to keep social welfare programs from being a wedge issue is to give the benefit to everyone. Jesus, why is that so hard.)

In a political world occupied by cautious lawyers (no shade on Kay, my family is full of lawyers, plus she’s not that cautious), Walz’ background as a teacher is a huge political benefit to him. He sees the good in a wide variety of people (as teachers must). He takes on responsibility if something he did failed — every kid who fails makes a teacher sad. He’s the ultimate team player, but like a good coach, once the game is done, he will look at what went wrong and what can be improved.

In the last 20 years, there are three politicians who I think are extraordinary: Obama, AOC and Walz. Right now, Walz is the morning star, and AOC is the evening star for Democrats.

(If you’ve read this far, you probably regret not just watching the video. Anyway, the title is a reference to a song by the drummer in one of Walz’ favorite bands, Hüsker Dü, Grant Hart. Grant died young (56), RIP. Here’s the song. Here’s Grant performing it live with a young guy, but first making sure he tries to sell the last three copies of that kid’s CD. Grant was born in St. Paul, and that’s a total Minnesotan move.)

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

d c1 year ago

What a dismal tragedy that we don't have this man and Harris leading our beleaguered nation.

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

It is indeed. But regret can be terribly corrosive. As Marlon Brando said:

“Regret is useless in life. It’s in the past. All we have is now.”

Avatar

Marmot Pimpernel 1 year ago

“In the last 20 years, there are three politicians who I think are extraordinary: Obama, AOC and Walz. Right now, Walz is the morning star, and AOC is the evening star for Democrats.”

Driftglass and Blue Gal love Pritzger, and from what I’ve seen of him, he’s good. Anyone have a more informed idea?

Avatar

Tam R1 year ago

I love Pritzker! He was my first choice for VP but I have no complaints about Walz. He brought the base back in the fold when we desperately needed to unite.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

There are a lot of politicians that I think are great. I really like Pritzker, and hope he's going to run for President. I don't know if Walz will, to be honest, but I think the reason I wrote that line was because all three kind of came out of nowhere to massive national prominence, and each of them was a bit unlikely if you just look at their resumes. So I have a special feeling about them that I don't about a lot of other politicians that I also really like.

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

I like Pritzker, too. He’s an effective voice for the “good billionaires” Ken Martin likes to talk about.

But I think it would be incredibly tone deaf to back a billionaire after this debacle with oligarchs comes to an end (hopefully). Not that the Democrats seem inclined at this point to embrace a full-on populist stance against oligarchy, but even if they don’t, the public sentiment is there.

It would be terribly unwise to embrace a billionaire for higher office after all this.

Avatar

Kay W.1 year ago

I think it was part of Biden's problem. You can't just want to win. You have to want to beat the other side. Obama was extremely competitive. What Obama did to Romney in Ohio in 2012 was the most brutal I've ever seen from any Democrat, with the exception of Bill Clinton. Its probably why lawyers are drawn to it - they're competitive people.

Avatar

Marmot Pimpernel 1 year ago

This is a blind spot for me—could you give me the Cliff’s Notes?

“What Obama did to Romney in Ohio in 2012 was the most brutal I've ever seen from any Democrat, with the exception of Bill Clinton.”

Avatar

Kay W.1 year ago

The Obama campaign attacked Mitt Romney every day, portraying him as an out of touch CEO - the boss no one likes. I went to a "bloggers meeting" with the campaign in DC in June of that year and Axelrod said they had already defined Romney and would win Ohio. The impression of Obama's campaign as "hope and change" was a Democratic and liberal impression. Republicans (rightly) understood Obama as fiercely competitive - a killer. Its why they hate him so much.

Avatar

Kay W.1 year ago

I like Walz a lot - I thought both Harris and Walz did a great job - but I think one has to be almost insanely competitive and driven to win the presidency and I don't see that in him. I favored Shapiro over him for just that reason - I'm much further Left than Shapiro but Shapiro is driven, like Obama and Clinton were. I think it's essential.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

I think you might be right on Walz and competitiveness. One thing about upper plains and Minnesota people is that they hide their competitiveness with a patina of niceness.

I'd be a bit surprised if he actually runs for President, or even if he runs for Tina Smith's open seat.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

Another way to put it after I think about it for a minute is that once Walz is in place, he will fight as hard as (or maybe harder than) an ambitious politician. The flip side of massive personal ambition sometimes is political caution. They want the job so damn much that they are a bit afraid to do risky things. I don't see that in Walz.

Another thing I like about Walz is that he was educated in teacher's colleges in the sticks, not the Ivy League. We need some of that kind of diversity, too.

Avatar

Kay W.1 year ago

True about Minnesota though - they sort of famously reject negative campaigns. Its a great place to live - I lived in the Twin Cities for 2 years and its a wonderful place. But Chicago, where Obama came up, is different. They're brawlers in the best possible way.

Avatar

Kay W.1 year ago

True about Minnesota though - they sort of famously reject negative campaigns. Its a great place to live - I lived in the Twin Cities for 2 years and its a wonderful place. But Chicago, where Obama came up, is different. They're brawlers in the best possible way.

Avatar

Kay W.1 year ago

True about Minnesota though - they sort of famously reject negative campaigns. Its a great place to live - I lived in the Twin Cities for 2 years and its a wonderful place. But Chicago, where Obama came up, is different. They're brawlers in the best possible way.

Avatar

Sepideh M1 year ago

I'm really happy for you, and I'm gonna let you finish, but Jasmine Crockett is one of the best Democratic communicators of all time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwTx1VuMlqo

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

I really love Jasmine Crockett. She is awesome.

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

Rep. Crockett is amazing. We need more folks like her in congress.

Avatar

Scott H1 year ago

“You lead with good policy and politics will follow that.”

Oh so true and oh so poorly followed by Dems in many cases. I've argued that sentence since I started re-commenting at BJ (although not in those words). Shawn Fain put it best recently when he said the Dem party needs to figure out who it's representing.

I'm not saying this to slag on Dems per se, we push a lot of macro-level, national policies that are great. But you start getting into the urban sphere and that's not necessarily the case and that's what a lot of people see play out and unless your white and professional, you can often question just what those Dems deliver. Also too, compare governors like Walz and our glibertarian, techbro, Polis. That's a prime example of the differences in leading with good policy and not.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

The critique that Democrats are too poll-driven dovetails with that quote.

Poll-test messaging about the good policies that you put in place. Don't avoid putting new policies in place because some poll with a question asked a certain way said that people don't want it.