This happened about ten days ago:

❝

Ontario is spending $75 million to broadcast a new anti-tariff ad in the United States, aimed at Republican voters.

The advertisement uses audio of former U.S. president Ronald Reagan speaking in 1987 about tariffs, saying they do not work in the long term.

Premier Doug Ford says Reagan, his favourite American president, will be easily identifiable for Republicans and they will hear the message that tariffs will end up hurting Americans.

Here’s the ad:

Doug Ford is the conservative Premier of Ontario (basically, the governor), but grandpa watching TV in his PJs saw the ad and got pissed at the whole country:

❝

Trump posts on Truth Social saying Canada “fraudulently” used a “FAKE” advertisement that featured Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about tariffs.

"TARIFFS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY, AND ECONOMY, OF THE U.S.A." Trump wrote. "Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED."

The Reagan Foundation (blegh) says Ford’s ad misrepresented Reagan, but Ford’s people say it’s an unedited excerpt of a speech. I mean, come on, tariffs are Trump’s little obsession — it’s pretty clear that Reagan was mostly a free trade guy.

Anyway, the bigger point here is that you just can’t cut a deal with Trump. Canadian PM Mark Carney was working diligently towards an agreement in the next few days, and Trump just took his toys and went home.

Carney is under pressure to do something about the US, and Canadians view this as existential — they took the 51st state rhetoric to heart. So, Carney has a lot of incentive to be tough. For example, he’s decreased the number of vehicles Stellantis and GM can export to the US without tariffs after those companies moved some production out of Canada.

Canada and Mexico rely on the US for trade, and both are run by smart politicians. Both Carney and Claudia Sheinbaum are working to diversify their economies away from over-reliance on US goods, and also moving to build more internal manufacturing and agricultural capacity (in the case of Mexico). It’s interesting that Carney has put himself front-and-center in negotiations, but Claudia has delegated it to her Minister of the Economy, Marcelo Ebrard. Trump’s latest arbitrary deadline of October 29 or else is approaching, and Ebrard says that he and the US are 90% done with negotiations. I’m sure Trump will blow them up somehow, Claudia knows this, and she’s wisely not hanging her political fortunes on making a deal with someone who’s never kept a deal in his life.

Trump has some leverage over Canada and Mexico, for now. Atrios posted this piece by Dean Baker that explains how the US has very little leverage over China. From what I can tell, they’ve effectively given up on negotiating and are going to instead bring the pain.

We just had a bad inflation report (it’s back to 3% per year). The tariff “strategy” or extended tantrum is a failure.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Scott H1 year ago

Yunno who to trust when evaluating Ronald Fucking Reagan on free trade:

The good glibertarians at the CATO Inst: https://www.cato.org/commentary/reagan-embraced-free-trade-immigration#

That was written 21 years ago:

It was the Reagan administration that launched the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations in 1986 that lowered global tariffs and created the World Trade Organization. It was his administration that won approval of the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement in 1988. That agreement soon expanded to include Mexico in what became the North American Free Trade Agreement, realizing a vision that Reagan first articulated in the 1980 campaign.

And, of course, free and unfettered trade with no effective checks and balances to protect workers, values, etc., has been bought by both sides of the aisle.

Every House Blue Dog and New Dem love them their neolib free trade policies and then wonder why they shed votes that the Dem party has no business shedding.

Avatar

Ramalama (ding dong)1 year ago

Carney went to a ton of meetings in Europe and ... seems like he's gotten interesting agreements going on regarding trade and the world away from the USA. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QX-p35QUalE

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

Yep, he's doing everything to lessen Canada's dependence on the US in all areas, while Trump flaps his gums.

Avatar
Avatar
Avatar

John S.1 year ago

Vibes are better than numbers!

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur1 year ago

I just had a frightful experience regarding numbers trying to follow tax rules & regs about disbursements this morning, which also implicates my landline phone provider and I'm ready to pull my hair out over trying to follow rules which are boobytrapped with too many hurdles and useless excuses! IOW, the vibes SUCK ha ha ha!

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

I saw the ad during the ALCS last week. It was chef’s kiss. I was curious about all the noise around this, so I asked AI for analysis. It was a real doozy. I’ll post in its entirety below.

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

What’s really happening is a fight over framing and ownership of Reagan’s legacy:

•	The Reagan Foundation is technically correct that the clip was edited and used without authorization — they guard Reagan’s image and words quite tightly, especially for political use. But that’s a copyright and branding complaint, not a factual one.

•	The claim that it “misrepresents” Reagan’s position is political spin. The ad doesn’t invent anything — it uses Reagan’s own argument that tariffs ultimately harm American workers, which aligns almost perfectly with his record as one of the most free-trade presidents in modern history.

•	Trump’s current tariff plan — a universal 10 % tariff on all imports and potentially 60 %+ on China — is the exact opposite of Reagan’s philosophy. Reagan explicitly warned that blanket protectionism would ignite trade wars and “hurt every American worker and consumer.”
Avatar

John S.1 year ago

So the Reagan Foundation’s objection boils down to this: they don’t want Reagan’s voice being used to criticize a sitting Republican president. But substantively, Reagan’s words do contradict Trump’s approach.

To summarize:

•	The footage in the ad? Real.
•	The message? Faithful to Reagan’s stated principles.
•	The objection? Mostly political, about optics and ownership rather than truth.
Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 year ago

Reagan is like Jesus for them -- somehow Jesus' teachings are the same as current Republican Party ideology.

Avatar

John S.1 year ago

The Republican Party follows both Reagan and Jesus’ teachings with the same level of accuracy. Which is to say, they don’t.