This graph shows how data centers fared in recent elections.

Left of the line is failure. It’s 45-1 against data centers. Yet BAAJA, the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026, is probably going to be brought to the Senate floor in the lame duck session, and this:

This group has a document detailing all the things that are wrong with BAAJA. The fact that the first word in it is “bipartisan” should be the clue. Schumer is trying to push this through in the lame duck to please his donors, as is his habit.

So this brings up whether the newly elected Democrats are going to vote for him as majority leader:

  • Peggy Flanagan is a hard no. I spent a little time yesterday watching her stump speeches, and she’s really good.

  • AES is a no, I think. Kay can correct us on that.

  • Adam Hamilton is a no, but it might be because Schumer blocked the farm bill. This guy is, by necessity, going to be a blue dog.

  • Troy Jackson is a no, unsurprisingly after Schumer’s interventions in Maine.

  • Annie Andrews just announced that she won’t support Schumer.

That all said, Chris Van Hollen is not running for Majority Leader. So one of the Senators who showed that he has some grit is not going to take on Chuck.

There is zero political damage that will be incurred from not passing BAAJA, because we’ve already overbuilt data centers.

Sepideh put this video of AES talking about omnibus bills in the comments yesterday, and this guy gets it. Listen to the whole thing to get his comment on those bills.

If you don’t like watching videos, the net of his comments were that big omnibus bills are dumb and that bills like the “Crap Lettuce Act” to make sure the FDA actually regulates our food supply are good policy and good politics (as Joe would say).

The big issue with Jeffries and Schumer is they came up in a generation of Democrats where the conventional wisdom was that the smart thing for Congress to do was to bundle together everything in big multi-thousand page omnibus bills where nobody could determine who was responsible for what. Those days are over. The new generation of legislators want to do good things and make a lot of noise about the good things they do. Mamdani is a great example of this, and he has a 69% approval rating. Blog hero Presidenta Claudia Sheinbaum-Pardo’s approval ratings hover around that number because she delivers. The new Senators and House members from marginal districts need to deliver to keep their seats.

The voters sent a message on Tuesday: no more business as usual. Schumer and Jeffries want business as usual. They need to go.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur10 minutes ago(edited)

This was on TCM on Election Eve. Tracy & Hepburn so fascinating, reminding us of the behind the scenes & consultants & managers & assorted manueverers (plus Angela Lansbury plays the villainess again a la Manchurian Candidate). Adolph Menjou has a role and he was all in on the HUAC and Hepburn wouldn't even look at him except when she had to.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_the_Union_(film)

"Shortly after completion, State of the Union was screened exclusively for President Harry Truman and reportedly helped convince him to run for office again.[16]"

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur10 minutes ago(edited)

The only film where Capra named a political party.

Avatar

Kay W.24 minutes ago

I have to say I did not expect the establishment wing of the Party to accept “money out of politics” as a plank in an anti corruption/good government platform although I DO think voters believe that is “corruption”. The Left really just started that debate within the Party the last 5 years. We have miles to go on it. I think voters understand we are not talking about early aughts or even 2010 levels of money. It’s 100x that. I think they know it’s out of control. Schumer’s daughter accepting a lobbying job is bad. That’s exactly the shit people hate, IMO. A mix of corruption and nepotism! Yuck.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur35 minutes ago

A body in motion stays in motion.

Use the momentum! January is a long ways from here.

"...Like, whether you lean more towards accountability or oversight or ___, the goal should be endless activity. Show the country that this Congress is On The Case(s). Democrats are the Do-Something Party."

https://bsky.app/profile/jamellebouie.net/post/3mznonrcrqk2c

Avatar

Kay W.40 minutes ago

My own preference is Schumer out, Jeffries stays. We know what Schumer will do, unlike Jeffries. I think the insurgents would accept that, too.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur44 minutes ago(edited)

Tiedrich agrees

https://www.jefftiedrich.com/p/all-we-want-are-democrats-wholl-fight

"Leave it to Republicans to show us how it’s done. They’re not even waiting until the next Congress to stick their knives into their targets. They’re doing it next week.

Maybe Hakeem Jeffries might want to take lessons from Thomas Massie."

Avatar

tam1MI 52 minutes ago

In all the excitement these last few days, I neglected to tell you guys about a great development in my House district - DSA adjacent progressive and housing advocate William Lawrence beat MAGA Republican Tom Barrett to take the seat! This district is as purple as you can get so a left-leaning Dem flipping the seat is a very big deal!

Avatar

Kay W.37 minutes ago

Thanks. I like him. Glad he won.

Avatar

Butch Fries1 hour ago

There's a very long post at Kos (https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2026/11/6/800123909/community/hakeem-jeffries-will-soon-take-the-wheel/) about what a great job Jeffries is doing and how we should all be supporting him even if we don't like him. I'll say I didn't find it very convincing.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor6 minutes ago

The embedded story is from Marci Wheeler (Emptywheel) and her judgement is suspect at best.

Avatar

Kay W.1 hour ago

AES ran on supporting Chris Van Hollen (rather than opposing Schumer) so I don’t know where he is now. More interesting is Slotkin. She wants “new leadership” and she’s no insurgent.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor1 hour ago

Van Hollen isn't going to challenge Schumer, but also he won't endorse Schumer. So who knows what's going on behind the scenes.

Avatar

Sepideh M55 minutes ago(edited)

DSA was all in for Van Hollen. Are they going to switch who they support as a party now? Van Hollen did not seem to mind at the time.

Van Hollen may be trying to leverage this into something better, but all these tenured Senators better watch out because one of these freshmen may go with it if their so called leaders are like "the party is going to party." They are mad and ready to get down to business.

Gina Hinajosa is already telling Elon that he can't have some Texas beach for his stupid data center.

These so-called leaders need to get it together. They are not working under the same conditions that they were working under before.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/6045751-van-hollen-dsa-endorsement-stance/

Avatar

Kay W.44 minutes ago

Ultimately this dispute is about having a very narrow view of corruption - illegality and outright theft like Trump is doing, and the “good government” Mamdani Left who have a broader definition including the corrupting effect of industry /corporate PACs. We won’t be able to talk to each across that divide until both sides nail down their respective definitions. We’re using one word but we have two different definitions. Obviously I’m in the “broader” group.

Avatar

Joe is Wypoxic5 minutes ago(edited)

I think this may be Van Hollen's way of easing himself into the discussion. I spent a fair amount of time with him when I was a candidate (both House and Senate). I'm not normally a fanboy, but I'm all in for him. First and most importantly, because he's a good person at heart. Like me, he just wants to make a positive difference. He comes across as likeable and open-minded, but I also saw serious spine in some of his efforts/decisions he undertook. don't count him out...

Avatar

tam1MI 13 minutes ago

I don't think AES is going to vote against Schumer for Majority Leader. He more than anyone has to know how bad the optics of the first Muslim to become a US Senator voting against the first Jew to be Senate Majority Leader would be.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor3 minutes ago

If it was a contest between Cory Booker and some white guy, would that mean that it is bad optics for any other white guy to vote for the white guy? That would mean a white guy standing in the way of the first black majority leader.