I became interested in public school governance about ten years ago. I attended public schools and so did our four children so it may have been inevitable that I got involved. My husband, however, did not attend public schools. My husband attended the same boarding school that Justice Roberts attended - the school has a little shrine to Roberts in the library, like he’s a saint. I stood and stared at it the longest time - in horror really.

One time we were at an alumni event and Roberts was there and my husband sort of crashed into the group of fawning Roberts acolytes, like a too-friendly Golden Retriever and demanded a photo. So we have a really funny photo of a pained looking John Roberts, stiff and unsmiling, being held hostage by my (much bigger), grinning husband. Anyway, both of us supported public schools when our kids were coming up but I’m the girl so was naturally expected to do all the unpaid work, so I ended up on a school committee, which was … completely fascinating and one of the best things I’ve ever done.

During that period, I met Jennifer Berkshire briefly in Austin Texas. She was there for a convention of public school enthusiasts and I was there for the same thing, except I brought my daughter and we mostly went to see the Battle Oaks on the UT campus - gorgeous, btw. Jennifer is a Lefty (as differentiated from a liberal) and she does actual reporting on public schools for both her podcast and Substack- meaning she goes to places and looks at real things and talks to people.

I think her take on the Texas race and public schools is great, and a different take that doesn’t rely wholly on demographics or ethnicity, but instead on the common ground of people across groups who value and support public education.

❝

While the Democrat’s flip of this seat was treated as a ‘Texas stunner’ by much of the media, yours truly wasn’t all that surprised. For one thing, as I wrote about last year, Rehmet nearly won the race outright back in November, despite spending just $68K vs millions shelled out by his GOP opponents and their deep-pocketed PACS. For another, Rehmet ran as an economic populist and an ardent defender of public education–in other words, exactly the sort of candidate that Democrats need if they are to succeed at, well, anything. And that support of public education was absolutely key here as the GOP’s education extremism alienates growing swathes of the electorate. Let’s break it down, shall we?

❝

The name Leigh Wambsganss may be unfamiliar (and unpronounceable) to you, but I’m betting that you’re well acquainted with her employer: Patriot Mobile. That would be the right-wing Christian wireless provider that orchestrated takeovers of various Texas school boards, stacking them with Christian nationalists and MAGA faithful. (For more on this, check out Mike Hixenbaugh’s terrific book They Came for the Schools). Those efforts proved remarkably successful, that is until local parents got a close-up view of the activists’ book-banning, culture warring agenda. Then came the attempt last year to split the Keller district into two, cleaving the wealthier city of Keller from its larger, lower-class suburban bits. The backroom maneuver, which Wambsganss helped engineer, backfired spectacularly, alienating local parents, along with voters who typically ignore school board politics.

❝

When voters gave the heave ho to culture warring school board candidates last year, they signalled their exhaustion with the politicization of public education. Rehmet tapped into that frustration to great effect. I’m going to quote again from his campaign website because the language is refreshingly clear: “Taylor will stand with teachers, parents, and students to invest in neighborhood schools, protect public education from privatization, and keep extremist politics and religious ideology out of the classroom.” And voters responded to this vision vs. the increasingly unhinged rhetoric of Steve Bannon, who set up a Texas wing of his War Room podcast in order to boost Wambsganss’ candidacy.

Bannon and Rufo engineered a far-Right takeover of local public schools, where they installed screeching lunatics ranting about Sharia law who despise public schools and hope to destroy them, and parents of public school children in both the higher and lower income schools rebelled and threw the bums out. Enter the Democratic machinist and labor candidate who promises to fund and protect public education.

We could run this campaign a lot of places. Not everywhere, but in a lot of very red midwestern and southern states.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Avatar

Kay W.9 months ago

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ruben-gallego-minimum-wage-2028_n_6983d055e4b0926afe6a9d32

WHAT is going on w/Ruben Gallego?!

First it was end ICE and now he wants a 20 dollar minimum wage! He’s like a reverse Fetterman. Maybe he’s just fucking HAD IT like the rest of us 😂

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur9 months ago

Meant to say how much I like the Balls & Strikes Roberts anecdote!

Avatar

Kay W.9 months ago

To get into the school, a prospective student has to submit a handwritten letter on why they should be admitted. Robert’s letter is under glass in the library, part of a little shrine to His Wonderfullness.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur9 months ago

🤮

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur9 months ago

MAGA neighbors across the street: Dad is a phys. ed teacher & football coach of course.

When the kids in our local school district mocked & shunned his eldest MAGA son (who now works in Congress in Rep. Randy Fine's office), he quit and took a job for less pay with a two hour daily commute to a redneck small town far, far away from all the libs here.

Pwned!

Avatar

Bupalos Just Bupalos9 months ago

I've seen a ton of optimism around Rehmet's "shocking" win but all in the general "Dems are doing great!" mode. No one seems to be talking about the actual mechanics of that race, and I guess I've been too lazy to go find out. So thanks for this. It seems to flatter my general preferences for the kind of candidates we need, just wish we were seeing more of them.

Avatar

TBone Dinosaur9 months ago

Don't know much about these candidates but the campaign ad is a winner IMO ("TAX THE RICH")

Reposting here from the other night on the J.W. thread:

"Today, I am proud to announce India Walton as my running mate in our campaign to become the next Governor and Lieutenant Governor of New York."

Video: https://bsky.app/profile/marisakabas.bsky.social/post/3me2acdh24c22

Avatar

Kay W.9 months ago

I fear Democrats are falling into the same nonsense regarding Latino voters that they did from 2000 to 2016: treating them as a group who have NO ordinary interests (schools, housing, wages) outside of their ethnicity.

It’s also weirdly racist, like Latinos are so much “the other” that they couldn’t possibly vote on …what everyone else votes on. It’s just such sloppy, bad thinking and it inevitably falls apart the moment it meets a real analysis on what swings races locally.

Avatar

Sepideh M9 months ago

Yes! Democrats treating Latino voters as a single entity is racist, and it loses them elections. It attempts to gloss over a lot of inter-Latino conflict too.

Like the Cuban American Floridian was so exhausted by our "(white) liberals" whose only relationship with people of color is perceiving them as poor and not as equals.

Then you have light skinned Peruvian Americans being snooty to all the Mexican Americans. A lot of Spanish speakers are snooty to the Mexican Americans. it is wild.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor9 months ago

There's a definite hierarchy in hispanic culture, but it's from the perspective of the person who's holding up the hierarchy. My Mexican mom's was: the more Spanish you are, the higher up the hierarchy you are, and of course Mexicans in general were superior. Cubans, to her, were waaaay down the hierarchy.

Knowing how my Mom thought, I'm sure the Rio Grande Valley Mexicans/hispanics who voted for Trump considered themselves farther up the hierarchy and therefore not the targets of Trump's anti-immigrant prejudice. Oops!

Avatar

mister mixAuthor9 months ago

In general, I'm not a fan of empty hopium.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor9 months ago

Even in the super red little town where I grew up and am currently staying, the schools are important. Some California MAGAt moved to town and started attending school board meetings, writing letters to the editor, etc. with MAGA nonsense and was completely rejected in her school board run.

Unfortunately, most schools around here have gone to four-day schooling, and they can't recruit STEM teachers so it's video teaching. In the two generations since I graduated, schools have really gone downhill.

Avatar

Kay W.9 months ago

Oh that’s sad. I think online school is a disaster for kids. We had at risk kids coming thru the juvenile courts, either as delinquents or abuse/neglect cases and so many of them had been shunted into cheap garbage online “academies” our juvenile judge started ordering them back to public schools. “You will attend your LOCAL school, IN PERSON…” He was right.

Avatar

Sepideh M9 months ago

Why can't we get STEM teachers willing to work for $30,000 a year and no pension? It is a mystery for the ages. i am sure.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor9 months ago

Yep, the low pay is the underlying problem. Also, housing shortage -- there's no rental housing in this town.

Avatar

mister mixAuthor9 months ago

The video part is video teaching with a supervising para in the room with the kids. I talked to one teacher from a nearby rural school, and he told me that the supervising para watched the math class for a couple of years and over time became comfortable (and good at) helping the kids with math. So not as bad as pure online education, but not great either.

Avatar

tam1MI 9 months ago

I'm not entirely sure that is true. I remember back in the 1980s reading a magazine article about how kids in the Australian outback had video schooling. It's apparently been a thing in Australia for decades, and they don't seem to have the same problems that we do with our schools and children not learning things.

Avatar

Joe is Wypoxic9 months ago

Great take Kay. I'm a former School Board Chair in my county. The vast majority of people - "left" and "right" - want public education for their kids. They want it to be safe and a place where their kids can just... learn.

Social Security has always been called the "Third Rail" of politics (for those of you who don't know the reference, it comes from the original subways that had two rails as tracks and a third rail that provided the electrical power for the trains. If you touched the third rail, that electricity tried to power you instead, which, well, never goes well.) I know this - I was born and raised in suburban NYC and lived in the City for a while.

It seems as if messing with public education might also be a "Third Rail" of politics. It's certainly an issue that Dems should push to the forefront.

Avatar

Sepideh M9 months ago

Governor Tate Reeves did not give his state of the state address. The Republicans in the Mississippi legislature crossed him by opposing his attempt to give away public education dollars to private schools.

https://www.mississippifreepress.org/gov-reeves-abruptly-postpones-state-of-the-state-address-indefinitely/

People like their public education. Even people in deep red states.

Avatar

Kay W.9 months ago

Vouchers are a disaster. They funnel money to these low quality private schools that stupid people think are “better” than public schools by virtue of being private.

Avatar

Joe is Wypoxic9 months ago

They are also just subsidies for rich people. Studies show the vast majority of those people who use vouchers are already sending their kids to private school.

Avatar

Scott H9 months ago

And yet, our glibertarian, techbro "Democratic" governor just accepted some aspect of a voucher program in Hair Furor's BBB bill...the only Dem governor to do that.

Any Democrat that supports vouchers is an auto "no" vote for me. It's bad enough we have so much Dem support for school "choice" ala charter schools and their like.